6.2 sec in total
406 ms
4.5 sec
1.3 sec
Click here to check amazing Evolutionstream content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about evolutionstream.com
Evolutionstream streaming aacplus con reproductor flash, streaming aac+, streaming he-aacplus, streaming he-aac+, streaming aacplus + rtmp, streaming aac+ + reproductor flash con rtmp, reseller stream...
Visit evolutionstream.comWe analyzed Evolutionstream.com page load time and found that the first response time was 406 ms and then it took 5.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
evolutionstream.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
18/100
10%
Value6.4 s
9/100
25%
Value4.3 s
76/100
10%
Value2,300 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.077
95/100
15%
Value7.8 s
44/100
10%
406 ms
71 ms
141 ms
221 ms
148 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Evolutionstream.com, 17% (15 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net and 14% (12 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) relates to the external source Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 464.5 kB (45%)
1.0 MB
563.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Evolutionstream.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 435.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 18.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.4 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Evolutionstream images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 298.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 298.6 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 124.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Evolutionstream.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 124.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (55%)
84
38
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Evolutionstream. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
evolutionstream.com
406 ms
widgetkit-d4cdd100.css
71 ms
style.css
141 ms
mootools-core.js
221 ms
core.js
148 ms
caption.js
151 ms
jquery.js
280 ms
widgetkit-1f5d0642.js
152 ms
base.css
201 ms
layout.css
209 ms
menus.css
209 ms
modules.css
255 ms
tools.css
271 ms
system.css
403 ms
extensions.css
397 ms
custom.css
414 ms
whitenoise.css
413 ms
droidsans.css
413 ms
droidsans.css
414 ms
droidsans.css
419 ms
style.css
418 ms
responsive.css
429 ms
print.css
423 ms
droidsans.css
433 ms
warp.js
436 ms
responsive.js
436 ms
accordionmenu.js
437 ms
dropdownmenu.js
444 ms
template.js
445 ms
lightbox.js
152 ms
mediaelement-and-player.js
133 ms
spotlight.js
172 ms
all.js
421 ms
base.css
174 ms
layout.css
180 ms
menus.css
178 ms
modules.css
176 ms
tools.css
174 ms
system.css
151 ms
system.css
143 ms
system-all.css
160 ms
print.css
144 ms
responsive.css
167 ms
noise_bg.jpg
106 ms
logo_green.png
152 ms
facebook.png
103 ms
twitter.png
115 ms
menubar.png
111 ms
banner.png
420 ms
barra.png
220 ms
totop_scroller.png
105 ms
close.png
104 ms
blank.gif
101 ms
DroidSans-webfont.woff
114 ms
233 ms
xd_arbiter.php
316 ms
xd_arbiter.php
578 ms
like.php
122 ms
like_box.php
191 ms
Of-YZRAFweH.js
1148 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
450 ms
3B0ArDU4qFI.css
341 ms
WEFvPNv7jzx.css
369 ms
XCdv7aD40Gm.js
512 ms
lnwXDK64af8.js
556 ms
mn6tHWuLI-Y.js
414 ms
x8BMxYCqTb9.js
426 ms
11138127_1652474651638221_2698497638525661337_n.png
1185 ms
996139_1652474248304928_8163315176940079605_n.png
1289 ms
12208551_1167946033295961_1133737352329698944_n.jpg
1419 ms
12360117_454618321400749_2698088001733435256_n.jpg
1545 ms
12805778_236575800019297_412673144424340715_n.jpg
1575 ms
11988245_418881194966446_1454584630331958193_n.jpg
1574 ms
12795283_1112372392127960_8000578474192528066_n.jpg
1542 ms
10325734_465347403660309_5057101077621013062_n.jpg
1573 ms
10455352_604276616386689_1413545493188844930_n.jpg
1559 ms
1535022_595762740574397_5457980058596993829_n.jpg
1600 ms
12112362_1713669632186591_6737371632013558021_n.jpg
1598 ms
8384_1704879929788484_7204466955599968952_n.jpg
1615 ms
12803186_1689536561306696_5718625594285950860_n.jpg
1834 ms
10314714_941779995911679_1626541023688716896_n.jpg
1718 ms
12801268_1510687335907332_6890059594604406299_n.jpg
1834 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
355 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
355 ms
VXcANLwwL5J.js
89 ms
50Trs1RKgUY.js
88 ms
evolutionstream.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
evolutionstream.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
evolutionstream.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Evolutionstream.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Spanish. Our system also found out that Evolutionstream.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
evolutionstream.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Evolutionstream. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: