5.6 sec in total
1.8 sec
3.6 sec
262 ms
Click here to check amazing E Web Alliance content for Sri Lanka. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about eweballiance.com
Web Alliance corporate trainers in heart of the Colombo in Sri Lanka. Web Alliance include corporate Training for photoshop with facebook marketing, Photoshop Workshop, Graphic designing for kids clas...
Visit eweballiance.comWe analyzed Eweballiance.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
eweballiance.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.0 s
100/100
10%
Value17.7 s
0/100
25%
Value7.3 s
28/100
10%
Value2,200 ms
6/100
30%
Value0.171
70/100
15%
Value24.1 s
0/100
10%
1798 ms
130 ms
680 ms
450 ms
267 ms
Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Eweballiance.com, 11% (10 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Eweballiance.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (23%)
7.8 MB
6.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Eweballiance.com main page is 7.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 5.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.6 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.8 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 254.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. E Web Alliance images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 985.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 985.3 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 486.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eweballiance.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 486.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (56%)
84
37
The browser has sent 84 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of E Web Alliance. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 32 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eweballiance.com
1798 ms
style.css
130 ms
bootstrap.min.css
680 ms
font-awesome.min.css
450 ms
slicknav.css
267 ms
style.css
691 ms
responsive.css
267 ms
animate.css
417 ms
normalize.css
357 ms
demo.css
355 ms
layout-simple.css
420 ms
red.css
421 ms
jade.css
428 ms
blue.css
429 ms
beige.css
718 ms
cyan.css
736 ms
green.css
725 ms
orange.css
734 ms
peach.css
725 ms
pink.css
736 ms
purple.css
804 ms
sky-blue.css
802 ms
yellow.css
788 ms
raw.css
802 ms
arham.css
807 ms
jquery-2.1.4.min.js
887 ms
jquery.migrate.js
896 ms
modernizrr.js
872 ms
bootstrap.min.js
933 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
915 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1160 ms
nivo-lightbox.min.js
989 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
1013 ms
jquery.appear.js
980 ms
count-to.js
980 ms
jquery.textillate.js
1019 ms
jquery.lettering.js
1093 ms
jquery.easypiechart.min.js
926 ms
jquery.nicescroll.min.js
997 ms
jquery.parallax.js
971 ms
jquery.slicknav.js
879 ms
script.js
880 ms
css
32 ms
css
44 ms
css
44 ms
css
45 ms
css
13 ms
css
15 ms
css
18 ms
css
15 ms
css
16 ms
css
17 ms
logo.jpg
147 ms
coprate-new.jpg
324 ms
banner2.jpg
270 ms
banner3.jpg
273 ms
banner4.jpg
149 ms
illustrator-sm.jpg
146 ms
home1.jpg
154 ms
home2.jpg
205 ms
home3.jpg
214 ms
home4.jpg
220 ms
c1.jpg
278 ms
c2.jpg
300 ms
c3.jpg
299 ms
c4.jpg
341 ms
c5.jpg
341 ms
c6.jpg
348 ms
c7.jpg
370 ms
c8.jpg
372 ms
c9.jpg
388 ms
c10.jpg
415 ms
c11.jpg
415 ms
c12.jpg
414 ms
map.png
448 ms
1.png
434 ms
2.png
449 ms
3.png
484 ms
4.png
478 ms
5.png
484 ms
6.png
499 ms
7.png
517 ms
8.png
521 ms
9.png
544 ms
10.png
568 ms
11.png
550 ms
12.png
577 ms
13.png
444 ms
14.png
456 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
466 ms
eweballiance.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
ARIA progressbar elements do not have accessible names.
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
eweballiance.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
eweballiance.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eweballiance.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eweballiance.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eweballiance.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of E Web Alliance. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: