3.6 sec in total
684 ms
2.5 sec
429 ms
Visit exetat.info now to see the best up-to-date Exetat content for Democratic Republic of Congo and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about exetat.info
Retrouvez toute l'actualité sur epsp exetat 2023. Les dates de publications de résultat, comment vérifier le résultat, trouver les items en pdf, dissertation et journal exetat
Visit exetat.infoWe analyzed Exetat.info page load time and found that the first response time was 684 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
exetat.info performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
60/100
10%
Value8.4 s
2/100
25%
Value5.4 s
56/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value0.493
17/100
15%
Value6.0 s
64/100
10%
684 ms
159 ms
191 ms
224 ms
261 ms
Our browser made a total of 58 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 41% of them (24 requests) were addressed to the original Exetat.info, 31% (18 requests) were made to Ezojs.com and 16% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (684 ms) belongs to the original domain Exetat.info.
Page size can be reduced by 99.7 kB (42%)
236.7 kB
137.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Exetat.info main page is 236.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 126.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 98.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 98.7 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 809 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 212 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Exetat.info has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 41 (89%)
46
5
The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Exetat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
exetat.info
684 ms
boise.js
159 ms
abilene.js
191 ms
tulsa.js
224 ms
et.js
261 ms
apbct-public-bundle.min.js
432 ms
ct-bot-detector-wrapper.js
120 ms
js
80 ms
reportads.js
36 ms
77435c89b0ba9fc83b98f5dcdbbc2121.js
152 ms
ta.js
368 ms
dismiss.js
135 ms
menu.min.js
221 ms
navigation-search.min.js
226 ms
back-to-top.min.js
251 ms
smush-lazy-load.min.js
233 ms
e-202404.js
284 ms
v.js
190 ms
mulvane.js
65 ms
wichita.js
80 ms
raleigh.js
97 ms
vista.js
106 ms
screx.js
45 ms
olathe.js
45 ms
lazy_load.js
85 ms
giphy.gif
84 ms
image-1.png
122 ms
css_onload.js
33 ms
script_delay.js
46 ms
stickyfix.js
44 ms
vitals.js
74 ms
drake.js
47 ms
chanute.js
43 ms
jellyfish.js
80 ms
all.min.css
111 ms
css
85 ms
style.min.css
50 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
46 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
48 ms
blocks.style.build.css
46 ms
cleantalk-public.min.css
48 ms
all.min.css
105 ms
font-icons.min.css
109 ms
style-min.css
101 ms
jetpack.css
102 ms
js
82 ms
analytics.js
76 ms
collect
14 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
23 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
38 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
45 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf
45 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf
68 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
46 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
68 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf
45 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf
68 ms
generatepress.woff
319 ms
exetat.info accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
exetat.info best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
exetat.info SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
FR
FR
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Exetat.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Exetat.info main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
exetat.info
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Exetat. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: