3.6 sec in total
140 ms
3 sec
437 ms
Visit exigent.net now to see the best up-to-date Exigent content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about exigent.net
Exigent provides IT Support, Managed IT Services, IT Consulting, Cyber Security and Cloud Services.
Visit exigent.netWe analyzed Exigent.net page load time and found that the first response time was 140 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
exigent.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
27/100
10%
Value38.1 s
0/100
25%
Value22.4 s
0/100
10%
Value41,370 ms
0/100
30%
Value1.326
0/100
15%
Value59.3 s
0/100
10%
140 ms
942 ms
85 ms
339 ms
90 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Exigent.net, 5% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Stats.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Exigent.net.
Page size can be reduced by 390.1 kB (17%)
2.3 MB
1.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Exigent.net main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.3 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.1 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 65.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Exigent images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 182.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 182.0 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 100.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Exigent.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 100.3 kB or 71% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (42%)
69
40
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Exigent. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
exigent.net
140 ms
www.exigent.net
942 ms
analytics.js
85 ms
dnr
339 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
90 ms
style.css
163 ms
dashicons.min.css
216 ms
desktop_style.css
164 ms
styles.css
165 ms
global.css
219 ms
timed-content.css
163 ms
jquery.js
287 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
249 ms
front_end_script.js
250 ms
timed-content.js
249 ms
jquery.form.min.js
276 ms
scripts.js
281 ms
jquery.cycle2.min.js
370 ms
jquery.mask.js
371 ms
jquery.mask.min.js
369 ms
theme.js
457 ms
wp-embed.min.js
456 ms
collect
80 ms
collect
321 ms
ga.js
128 ms
logo-withtagline-reversed.png
130 ms
search-icon.png
131 ms
search-icon-after.png
132 ms
bannertxt21.png
134 ms
left-arrow.png
134 ms
bannertxt1-v21.png
134 ms
right-arrow.png
188 ms
bannertxt4-v41.png
511 ms
banner-text-managed-it.png
638 ms
assurance1.png
524 ms
cloud1.png
191 ms
consulting1.png
524 ms
previous-services.png
507 ms
next-services.png
525 ms
565828913.png
527 ms
signup-icon.png
528 ms
fb.png
530 ms
tw.png
529 ms
li.png
530 ms
yt.png
532 ms
gp.png
531 ms
glassdoor_icon_Exigent.png
532 ms
sdk.js
518 ms
gtm.js
518 ms
saleschat-icon.png
509 ms
remote-icon.png
509 ms
phone-icon.png
510 ms
previous.png
511 ms
next.png
710 ms
bannerbg21.jpg
829 ms
buddy1.png
734 ms
bannerbg11.jpg
793 ms
Daniel-Roth-Exigent-Technologies-4.png
1122 ms
bannerbg41.jpg
967 ms
Linn-Huynh-Exigent-Technologies_2.png
1548 ms
bannerbg31.jpg
1000 ms
Slavic-Faydel-Exigent-Technologies_2.png
971 ms
triplelinebg.png
795 ms
doubleline-bg.png
855 ms
roboto-regular-webfont.woff
911 ms
roboto-bold-webfont.woff
931 ms
roboto-light-webfont.woff
966 ms
roboto-black-webfont.woff
985 ms
f50e0b47-b643-4fa7-8b77-d96801247979.js
427 ms
ajax-loader.gif
654 ms
collect
107 ms
295 ms
collect
76 ms
xd_arbiter.php
155 ms
xd_arbiter.php
286 ms
blank.gif
122 ms
s.gif
258 ms
exigent.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
exigent.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
exigent.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Exigent.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Exigent.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
exigent.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Exigent. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: