5.8 sec in total
206 ms
4.8 sec
799 ms
Welcome to exigogroup.com homepage info - get ready to check Exigo Group best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about exigogroup.com
Visit exigogroup.comWe analyzed Exigogroup.com page load time and found that the first response time was 206 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
exigogroup.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value5.3 s
21/100
25%
Value4.2 s
78/100
10%
Value730 ms
40/100
30%
Value0.078
95/100
15%
Value6.9 s
54/100
10%
206 ms
81 ms
131 ms
136 ms
159 ms
Our browser made a total of 98 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (82 requests) were addressed to the original Exigogroup.com, 4% (4 requests) were made to Js.zohostatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Exigogroup.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (34%)
4.8 MB
3.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Exigogroup.com main page is 4.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 56.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 56.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 49.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Exigo Group images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 909.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 909.8 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 631.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Exigogroup.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 631.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 66 (73%)
91
25
The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Exigo Group. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 44 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.exigogroup.com
206 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
81 ms
beopen-love.css
131 ms
styles.css
136 ms
settings.css
159 ms
prettyPhoto.css
151 ms
font-awesome.css
155 ms
beopen-font.css
548 ms
fontello.css
220 ms
woocommerce.css
300 ms
base.css
377 ms
general.css
327 ms
responsive.css
253 ms
default.css
314 ms
style.css
414 ms
YTPlayer.css
421 ms
custom.css
418 ms
css
35 ms
css
52 ms
revolution.slider.css
438 ms
animations.css
439 ms
js_composer.css
454 ms
jquery.js
506 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
482 ms
beopen-love.js
481 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
577 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
628 ms
bootstrap.js
603 ms
jquery.nicescroll.min.js
668 ms
jquery.mb.YTPlayer.js
643 ms
flexslider.css
665 ms
jquery.form.min.js
715 ms
scripts.js
711 ms
core.min.js
712 ms
masonry.min.js
755 ms
hoverIntent.min.js
833 ms
superfish.js
834 ms
jquery.waitforimages.min.js
834 ms
jquery.sticky.js
774 ms
jquery.reveal.js
726 ms
jquery.customforms.js
720 ms
jquery.placeholder.min.js
758 ms
jquery.tooltips.js
736 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
747 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
689 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
654 ms
jquery.transit.min.js
585 ms
ifvisible.js
637 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
657 ms
jquery.debouncedresize.js
623 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
631 ms
klass.min.js
572 ms
jquery.photoswipe-3.0.5.min.js
607 ms
jquery.jplayer.min.js
641 ms
jquery.plugin.min.js
622 ms
app.js
639 ms
wp-embed.min.js
648 ms
js_composer_front.js
657 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
656 ms
analytics.js
60 ms
linkid.js
28 ms
collect
192 ms
collect
245 ms
float.ls
1214 ms
logo_small.png
1188 ms
Homepage-Images-v4-Zoho1.png
1196 ms
Homepage-Images-v4-Comptia1.png
1400 ms
Homepage-Images-v4-Ringio2.png
2291 ms
Homepage-Images-v4-Gorilla1.png
1289 ms
Homepage-Images-v4-Ring-Central1.png
2285 ms
Homepage-Images-v4-PandaDoc1.png
1199 ms
Homepage-Images-v4-Capture2.png
1607 ms
Home-Items-03.png
1243 ms
Home-Items-02.png
1393 ms
Home-Items-01.png
1355 ms
michael_circle.png
1285 ms
robert_circle.png
1326 ms
kara_circle.png
1349 ms
ron_circle.png
1410 ms
zoho380px.png
1520 ms
ringio-partner.png
1462 ms
broadlook-partner.png
1519 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1634 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1526 ms
fontello.woff
1570 ms
gorilla-partner.png
1616 ms
small_left.png
867 ms
small_right.png
945 ms
flexslider-icon.woff
680 ms
floatsupportbtn.css
487 ms
track.js
201 ms
spacer.gif
413 ms
drawchat.ls
754 ms
wmsliteapi.js
31 ms
floatchat.css
110 ms
floatchat.js
230 ms
resource.js
145 ms
chatwindowtouch.css
89 ms
exigogroup.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
exigogroup.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
exigogroup.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Exigogroup.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Exigogroup.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
exigogroup.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Exigo Group. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: