24.9 sec in total
100 ms
24.5 sec
339 ms
Visit eyepole.com now to see the best up-to-date Eye Pole content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about eyepole.com
With this tactical telescoping surveillance camera tool you will be able to safely peer into the darkest,most dangerous and most remote places in your operating environment.
Visit eyepole.comWe analyzed Eyepole.com page load time and found that the first response time was 100 ms and then it took 24.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.
eyepole.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.5 s
0/100
10%
Value17.9 s
0/100
25%
Value15.8 s
0/100
10%
Value1,820 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.208
60/100
15%
Value30.6 s
0/100
10%
100 ms
2140 ms
462 ms
113 ms
1237 ms
Our browser made a total of 86 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Eyepole.com, 15% (13 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (14.4 sec) relates to the external source Web.archive.org.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (40%)
3.0 MB
1.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Eyepole.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 66.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Eye Pole images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 504.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 504.7 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 607.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Eyepole.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 607.5 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (75%)
67
17
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Eye Pole. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
eyepole.com
100 ms
index.php
2140 ms
eyepole.com
462 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
113 ms
style.min.css
1237 ms
styles.css
143 ms
header-footer-elementor.css
145 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
183 ms
animations.min.css
169 ms
frontend.min.css
235 ms
post-14.css
208 ms
post-113.css
239 ms
frontend.css
341 ms
post-121.css
248 ms
post-126.css
284 ms
style.css
1421 ms
owl.carousel.min.css
31 ms
cherry-handler-styles.min.css
1285 ms
jet-widgets.css
312 ms
jet-widgets-skin.css
349 ms
juxtapose.css
396 ms
css
43 ms
fontawesome.min.css
380 ms
solid.min.css
405 ms
regular.min.css
450 ms
brands.min.css
437 ms
jquery.min.js
467 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
497 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
41 ms
js
75 ms
cherry-js-core.min.js
1529 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
543 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
622 ms
index.js
729 ms
polyfills.js
788 ms
primary-navigation.js
851 ms
responsive-embeds.js
905 ms
cherry-handler.min.js
959 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1005 ms
frontend.js
1052 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
1161 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
1102 ms
core.min.js
1161 ms
dialog.min.js
1100 ms
waypoints.min.js
1079 ms
share-link.min.js
1126 ms
swiper.min.js
1117 ms
frontend.min.js
1169 ms
jet-widgets.js
1140 ms
preloaded-elements-handlers.min.js
1294 ms
Eyepol-Banner-Revised.jpg
316 ms
eyeon-final-logo123.png
93 ms
Component-1-%E2%80%93-1.png
210 ms
hall.jpg
93 ms
Screenshot_179.png
72 ms
udc.jpg
193 ms
swat2.jpg
209 ms
bg3.jpg
93 ms
army2.jpg
211 ms
footer-bg.jpg
209 ms
ntoa-logo.png
209 ms
Banner-Eyeon.jpg
392 ms
js
129 ms
analytics.js
124 ms
P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk37cxcABrE.ttf
217 ms
P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk338xcABrE.ttf
218 ms
P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk3M8tcABrE.ttf
255 ms
P5sfzZCDf9_T_3cV7NCUECyoxNk3CstcABrE.ttf
266 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Hw5aX8.ttf
292 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtZ6Hw5aX8.ttf
292 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCs16Hw5aX8.ttf
292 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr6Hw5aX8.ttf
302 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCtr6Xw5aX8.ttf
292 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCu173w5aX8.ttf
293 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCuM73w5aX8.ttf
304 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvr73w5aX8.ttf
305 ms
JTUHjIg1_i6t8kCHKm4532VJOt5-QNFgpCvC73w5aX8.ttf
305 ms
fa-solid-900.woff
122 ms
fa-regular-400.woff
253 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
264 ms
Banner-Eyeon.jpg
300 ms
collect
98 ms
collect
93 ms
print.css
103 ms
js
34 ms
analytics.js
14401 ms
eyepole.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
eyepole.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
eyepole.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Eyepole.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Eyepole.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
eyepole.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Eye Pole. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: