3.2 sec in total
146 ms
2.6 sec
459 ms
Visit ezedim.com now to see the best up-to-date Ezedim content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ezedim.com
Search Engine Optimization uses the latest tools of Google ranking to analyse your website. Our SEO experts will check what your competitions websites are doing compared to your websites and social me...
Visit ezedim.comWe analyzed Ezedim.com page load time and found that the first response time was 146 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
ezedim.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
65/100
10%
Value7.6 s
4/100
25%
Value17.3 s
0/100
10%
Value590 ms
50/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value8.0 s
43/100
10%
146 ms
1863 ms
105 ms
171 ms
187 ms
Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 55% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Ezedim.com, 16% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Ezedim.com.
Page size can be reduced by 28.2 kB (3%)
921.7 kB
893.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Ezedim.com main page is 921.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 783.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.8 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 421 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ezedim images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 162 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ezedim.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (54%)
24
11
The browser has sent 24 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ezedim. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ezedim.com
146 ms
ezedim.com
1863 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
105 ms
156-layout.css
171 ms
style.css
187 ms
style.min.css
198 ms
css
29 ms
jquery.js
233 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
203 ms
js
64 ms
156-layout.js
176 ms
navigation.min.js
298 ms
skip-link-focus-fix.min.js
297 ms
wp-embed.min.js
297 ms
analytics.js
94 ms
hero.jpg
368 ms
home-1.jpg
198 ms
home-2.jpg
174 ms
home-3.jpg
187 ms
ezedim-tagged-logo.jpg
90 ms
js
65 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
49 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
50 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
103 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf
103 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKeiunDXbtY.ttf
103 ms
collect
60 ms
collect
60 ms
collect
39 ms
js
38 ms
collect
56 ms
ezedim.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
ezedim.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
ezedim.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ezedim.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ezedim.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ezedim.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ezedim. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: