2.4 sec in total
150 ms
2.1 sec
175 ms
Welcome to power-plant-europe.energytechreview.com homepage info - get ready to check Power Plant Europe Energy Tech Review best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about power-plant-europe.energytechreview.com
Energy Tech Review is a print and digital magazine that aggregates the brightest of minds, expert opinions, latest energy technologies news, analyses, and argument about the critical issues that exist...
Visit power-plant-europe.energytechreview.comWe analyzed Power-plant-europe.energytechreview.com page load time and found that the first response time was 150 ms and then it took 2.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
power-plant-europe.energytechreview.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.1 s
46/100
10%
Value6.7 s
8/100
25%
Value5.3 s
58/100
10%
Value1,690 ms
11/100
30%
Value0.25
50/100
15%
Value13.4 s
11/100
10%
150 ms
511 ms
512 ms
350 ms
412 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 15% of them (12 requests) were addressed to the original Power-plant-europe.energytechreview.com, 48% (38 requests) were made to Energytechreview.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (858 ms) relates to the external source Energytechreview.com.
Page size can be reduced by 125.3 kB (17%)
731.6 kB
606.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Power-plant-europe.energytechreview.com main page is 731.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 370.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 54.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 54.0 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Power Plant Europe Energy Tech Review images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 14.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 51.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Power-plant-europe.energytechreview.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 51.5 kB or 55% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (65%)
69
24
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Power Plant Europe Energy Tech Review. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
power-plant-europe.energytechreview.com
150 ms
power-plant-europe.energytechreview.com
511 ms
bootstrap.css
512 ms
font-awesome.min.css
350 ms
animate.css
412 ms
owl.carousel.css
292 ms
owl.theme.default.css
296 ms
normalize.css
299 ms
slicknav.min.css
353 ms
style1.css
126 ms
main.css
417 ms
responsive.css
363 ms
modernizr-3.5.0.min.js
413 ms
css
50 ms
css
68 ms
css
100 ms
js
111 ms
gpt.js
226 ms
adsbygoogle.js
211 ms
element.js
98 ms
new_region.css
410 ms
style.css
140 ms
jQuery.verticalCarousel.css
146 ms
jquery.min.js
57 ms
jQuery.verticalCarousel.js
192 ms
jquery.flipbox.css
197 ms
cube_slider.css
201 ms
jquery.flipbox.js
203 ms
jquery.min.js
667 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
413 ms
jquery.waypoints.min.js
415 ms
jquery.slicknav.min.js
418 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
420 ms
main.js
664 ms
smart-sticky.js
665 ms
theia-sticky-sidebar.js
664 ms
jquery_cookie.js
665 ms
custom.js
858 ms
jquery.easy-ticker.js
734 ms
analytics.js
263 ms
gpt.js
436 ms
atrk.js
229 ms
Final-Logo.png
499 ms
linkedin_cirr.png
230 ms
load.gif
228 ms
450x308_t173.jpg
403 ms
450x308_LT0G.jpg
414 ms
e5wus30040061.jpg
227 ms
450x308_5A4n.jpg
432 ms
450x308_64RG.jpg
401 ms
450x308_a71c.psd
402 ms
a9c9yAward-Logo.jpg
575 ms
450x308_f087.jpg
576 ms
450x308_qhof.jpg
574 ms
450x308_3BTK.webp
577 ms
x.png
493 ms
pubads_impl.js
162 ms
show_ads_impl.js
480 ms
zrt_lookup_nohtml.html
200 ms
jizDREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTiUf2zI.ttf
186 ms
jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi3s-CI0q14.ttf
191 ms
jizAREVNn1dOx-zrZ2X3pZvkTi20-SI0q14.ttf
200 ms
css
143 ms
font-awesome.min.css
172 ms
nuFvD-vYSZviVYUb_rj3ij__anPXJzDwcbmjWBN2PKdFvXDXbtY.ttf
164 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
243 ms
collect
144 ms
ads
107 ms
container.html
59 ms
js
68 ms
450x308_a71c.psd
83 ms
icon-up.png
84 ms
1261171924365000533
237 ms
icon.png
303 ms
abg_lite.js
302 ms
window_focus.js
303 ms
ufs_web_display.js
113 ms
fontawesome-webfont.ttf
232 ms
ads
215 ms
power-plant-europe.energytechreview.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
power-plant-europe.energytechreview.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
power-plant-europe.energytechreview.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Power-plant-europe.energytechreview.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Power-plant-europe.energytechreview.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
power-plant-europe.energytechreview.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Power Plant Europe Energy Tech Review. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: