7.2 sec in total
312 ms
6.3 sec
608 ms
Visit us.epg.com now to see the best up-to-date Us EPG content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about us.epg.com
Ehrhardt + Partner Group is a leading global provider of supply chain execution software for smarter logistics management.
Visit us.epg.comWe analyzed Us.epg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 312 ms and then it took 6.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
us.epg.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
36/100
10%
Value18.0 s
0/100
25%
Value8.7 s
16/100
10%
Value840 ms
34/100
30%
Value0.34
33/100
15%
Value15.0 s
7/100
10%
312 ms
688 ms
114 ms
226 ms
319 ms
Our browser made a total of 110 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (92 requests) were addressed to the original Us.epg.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Script.crazyegg.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Us.epg.com.
Page size can be reduced by 280.7 kB (3%)
8.7 MB
8.4 MB
In fact, the total size of Us.epg.com main page is 8.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 8.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 108.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 42.6 kB, which is 34% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 108.5 kB or 87% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 172.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Us EPG images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 140 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 50 (51%)
98
48
The browser has sent 98 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Us EPG. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
us.epg.com
312 ms
us.epg.com
688 ms
font-awesome.min.1705412851.css
114 ms
slick.1705412851.css
226 ms
slick-theme.1705412851.css
319 ms
animate.1705412851.css
343 ms
main.1705412925.css
345 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.1705412851.css
319 ms
us.1705412938.css
326 ms
custom.1705412851.css
345 ms
gartnerbutton.1705412925.css
429 ms
conversion.js
36 ms
jquery-2.2.4.min.1705412851.js
460 ms
jquery-ui.min.1705412851.js
461 ms
Form.min.1679583754.js
464 ms
bootstrap.min.1705412851.js
462 ms
bootstrap-toolkit.min.1705412851.js
462 ms
slick.min.1705412851.js
555 ms
lazysizes.min.1705412851.js
555 ms
ls.unveilhooks.min.1705412851.js
556 ms
visible.1705412851.js
585 ms
circle-progress.1705412851.js
585 ms
ScrollMagic.1705412851.js
586 ms
js.cookie.1705412851.js
662 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.1705412851.js
666 ms
scripts.1705412851.js
665 ms
main.1705412940.js
814 ms
widget
846 ms
modex-logo.svg
377 ms
logo_US.svg
375 ms
gartner-logo.png
391 ms
csm_EPS.US_Modex_2024_Website-Header-Picture_fff010da19.jpg
697 ms
csm_gartner-vrs-report_header_80f5ee3544.jpg
604 ms
csm_EUP-DE_Gartner-MQ_Header-Webseite_2160x1040px_2023-05_V2-0_opt_bd0ae686a5.png
4835 ms
csm_EPS.US_Header-Startseite_Vocollect_2023_cef974e513.png
881 ms
csm_pick-by-voice__2__5cdc00b05a.jpg
806 ms
csm_pick-by-voice__8__020a6d54b9.jpg
980 ms
csm_CONA-Case-Study-Truck_05330e5137.jpg
694 ms
csm_EBL_HRL_Shuttle_02_1920px_d589a7a952.jpg
915 ms
csm_Banner2_optimized_87ae059baa.jpg
913 ms
csm_pick-by-voice__4__3e05a93639.jpg
922 ms
csm_Pet-Food-Experts-warehouse-management-software-lydia-voice-reference_135426c5b5.jpg
993 ms
csm_Simba-Dickie-replaced-Vocollect-Voice-with-Lydia-Voice_87424d280f.jpg
1025 ms
csm_Hellmann-old-livery-2_095b94a1bf.jpg
1027 ms
csm_CONA-Case-Study-Truck_bfe8d2c6a7.jpg
1036 ms
csm_Vestas-case-study-warehouse-management-system-3PL-9_332c2d7c7d.jpeg
1092 ms
csm_Ferguson-case-study-lydia-voice-for-voice-picking_quote6_9d38bb4f9d.jpg
1105 ms
csm_South-Shore-Furniture-case-study-lydia-voice-for-voice-picking_quote3_5db04aeeb6.jpg
1138 ms
4zsOoXNpCfrHuTaO8r0u
388 ms
gtm.js
161 ms
csm_Caterpillar-case-study-voice-solution-warehouse_9c1e04e786.jpg
1115 ms
globalsite_gartner_logo_02.png
1122 ms
modern-materials-handling-vector-logo.png
1176 ms
DCVelocity-Log.png
1189 ms
Inbound-Logistics-1.png
1220 ms
82 ms
logo-logistics-management-logo-002.png
1134 ms
92679273-9798-4d27-893b-d53dfd2bb4c7.woff
1141 ms
a5b8bb93-9622-41a0-b35f-a44a14f0c095.woff
1198 ms
7fd00069-f615-471e-8089-b0bab013cfd9.woff
1187 ms
icomoon.ttf
1210 ms
glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff
1221 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1236 ms
js
176 ms
insight.min.js
353 ms
analytics.js
346 ms
7702.js
345 ms
344 ms
803af1a9-a09b-4de5-ba36-e3d228fb5bc4.woff
1253 ms
92c69f6c-0185-4eb2-800e-1ee3947ca4dd.woff
1124 ms
0248a27d-0abf-4b74-a3c5-47a73e09098d.woff
1153 ms
slick.woff
1142 ms
supplychaindive_02.png
1139 ms
SupplyChainLogo-176px.jpg
1175 ms
SAP-Insider.jpg
1172 ms
collect
31 ms
us.epg.com.json
23 ms
Gartner-Peer-Insights-Customer-First-Batch.png
1020 ms
fe0cd9e3e34eb8a86f099c31f796da84.js
11 ms
collect
12 ms
ga-audiences
15 ms
icon-list-checkmark.svg
945 ms
US.png
945 ms
MX.png
855 ms
website
449 ms
DE.png
785 ms
CZ.png
833 ms
NL.png
839 ms
PT.png
833 ms
ES.png
793 ms
FR.png
786 ms
GB.png
833 ms
PL.png
839 ms
IT.png
832 ms
AE.png
794 ms
JP.png
786 ms
AU.png
834 ms
ep_wms.warehouse.icon.KO_37.png
838 ms
ep_wcs.machinepicking.icon.KO_18.png
832 ms
ep_lms.helmetgear.icon.KO_07.png
795 ms
ep_Voice.headset.icon.KO_47.png
787 ms
whitepaper_48.svg
833 ms
video_46.svg
836 ms
studien_46.svg
808 ms
floatbutton1_Ff3851fN8CiNYBFyu69G3fn8LloPKvaS8fBsAWPPEUK8A0h_dhIUAfcYBxt7FIV0_.css
140 ms
floatbutton1_3Nvpd2LyURI0uSsF0yDPNIiLC4wb7l-QKCFvq8Vbyfr4piNrOkG8bAJlnfQc4kL-_.js
269 ms
casestudies_54.svg
774 ms
icon-international_63.svg
765 ms
icon-nav-arrow.svg
819 ms
ajax-loader.gif
833 ms
us.epg.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.
[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
us.epg.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
us.epg.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Us.epg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Us.epg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
us.epg.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Us EPG. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: