5.9 sec in total
251 ms
3.5 sec
2.2 sec
Click here to check amazing 2005 Filemail content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about 2005.filemail.com
Send large files free via email and links. Paid accounts share files of any size. Fast secure online file transfer using our file sharing site & apps.
Visit 2005.filemail.comWe analyzed 2005.filemail.com page load time and found that the first response time was 251 ms and then it took 5.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
2005.filemail.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.5 s
68/100
10%
Value2.5 s
90/100
25%
Value4.0 s
80/100
10%
Value6,600 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.044
99/100
15%
Value10.7 s
22/100
10%
251 ms
703 ms
42 ms
269 ms
36 ms
Our browser made a total of 44 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original 2005.filemail.com, 75% (33 requests) were made to Filemail.com and 11% (5 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Filemail.com.
Page size can be reduced by 246.9 kB (10%)
2.4 MB
2.2 MB
In fact, the total size of 2005.filemail.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 174.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 174.6 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 71.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. 2005 Filemail images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 369 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. 2005.filemail.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 369 B or 36% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (8%)
40
37
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of 2005 Filemail. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
2005.filemail.com
251 ms
www.filemail.com
703 ms
gtm.js
42 ms
fontspreload.css
269 ms
analytics.js
36 ms
js
33 ms
collect
312 ms
af52ea9062232304161fc78f2541bbd69c49968419bab
664 ms
collect
5 ms
logo-horiz.svg
241 ms
logo.svg
335 ms
send-large-files.svg
1210 ms
send-big-files.svg
1219 ms
brands.png
1218 ms
2e77655f7c19fe428ebed107e9b4d1
1087 ms
fa-light-300.woff
1098 ms
ga-audiences
59 ms
security.png
149 ms
track.png
146 ms
speed.png
145 ms
download.png
201 ms
embed.png
146 ms
customize.png
147 ms
send-large-files-windows.2x.png
283 ms
send-large-files-outlook.2x.png
375 ms
send-large-files-iphone-ipad.2x.png
295 ms
send-large-files-android.2x.png
210 ms
integrated-uploader-to-transfer-large-files.2x.png
568 ms
branding-emails-transfer-large-files.2x.png
1187 ms
api-for-transferring-large-files.2x.png
306 ms
max-score.png
374 ms
almost-max-score.png
386 ms
austrian-film-commission.png
398 ms
british-film-institute.png
468 ms
bullhouse-media.png
467 ms
clear-channel-logo.png
479 ms
college-of-legal-practice.png
497 ms
discovery-channel-2019.png
560 ms
spare-bank.svg
562 ms
127.0.0.1
47 ms
collect
16 ms
collect
56 ms
sprite.png
378 ms
collect
4 ms
2005.filemail.com accessibility score
2005.filemail.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
2005.filemail.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise 2005.filemail.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that 2005.filemail.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
2005.filemail.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of 2005 Filemail. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: