1.3 sec in total
294 ms
862 ms
153 ms
Visit fanetteg.com now to see the best up-to-date Fanette G content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about fanetteg.com
Visit fanetteg.comWe analyzed Fanetteg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 294 ms and then it took 1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
fanetteg.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.4 s
36/100
10%
Value10.4 s
0/100
25%
Value3.7 s
85/100
10%
Value160 ms
94/100
30%
Value1.239
1/100
15%
Value4.5 s
82/100
10%
294 ms
173 ms
184 ms
43 ms
50 ms
Our browser made a total of 13 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (8 requests) were addressed to the original Fanetteg.com, 15% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 8% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (347 ms) belongs to the original domain Fanetteg.com.
Page size can be reduced by 202.7 kB (61%)
333.9 kB
131.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Fanetteg.com main page is 333.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 128.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 4.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.7 kB, which is 48% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 4.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 881 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fanette G images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 86.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 86.8 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 110.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fanetteg.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 110.6 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (36%)
11
7
The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fanette G. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
fanetteg.com
294 ms
bootstrap.css
173 ms
fanetteg.css
184 ms
css
43 ms
jquery.min.js
50 ms
jquery.js
48 ms
bootstrap.js
219 ms
retina.js
225 ms
analytics.js
47 ms
logo.png
86 ms
img_accueil.jpg
347 ms
Ambroise.otf
177 ms
collect
16 ms
fanetteg.com accessibility score
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
fanetteg.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
fanetteg.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fanetteg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Fanetteg.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
fanetteg.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fanette G. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: