6.6 sec in total
478 ms
5.9 sec
209 ms
Visit faveton.com now to see the best up-to-date Faveton content for Spain and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about faveton.com
Ventilated façades in terracotta and porcelain developed by our team that improve the energy efficiency and thermal insulation of the building.
Visit faveton.comWe analyzed Faveton.com page load time and found that the first response time was 478 ms and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
faveton.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.9 s
1/100
10%
Value31.0 s
0/100
25%
Value66.5 s
0/100
10%
Value81,790 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value103.4 s
0/100
10%
478 ms
2406 ms
220 ms
221 ms
223 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Faveton.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Faveton.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (64%)
1.9 MB
675.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Faveton.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 890.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 75.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 75.1 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 67 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Faveton images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 658.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 658.7 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 476.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Faveton.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 476.6 kB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (83%)
40
7
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Faveton. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
faveton.com
478 ms
www.faveton.com
2406 ms
language-selector.css
220 ms
advanced-responsive-video-embedder-public.css
221 ms
estilos.css
223 ms
styles.css
224 ms
settings.css
460 ms
captions.php
1519 ms
style.css
1488 ms
font-awesome.css
559 ms
animations.css
561 ms
media.css
914 ms
jquery.js
1135 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
785 ms
principal.js
787 ms
jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js
1530 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
1599 ms
css
25 ms
jquery.ui.core.min.js
730 ms
jquery.ui.widget.min.js
937 ms
jquery.ui.mouse.min.js
945 ms
jquery.ui.draggable.min.js
1287 ms
jquery.ui.droppable.min.js
1161 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1420 ms
scripts.js
1314 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1343 ms
modernizr-min.js
1497 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1-min.js
1715 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto-min.js
1601 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
1743 ms
jquery.fitvids-min.js
1565 ms
main.js
2672 ms
js
26 ms
easy2map.js
1806 ms
jquery.xml2json.js
1788 ms
sitepress.js
1807 ms
analytics.js
18 ms
idiomas-faveton.jpg
1756 ms
idiomas-up_1.png
887 ms
idiomas-down.png
808 ms
DsLzC9scoPnrGiwYYMQXpkpeNX8RPf6i6WQfJWyCWEs.ttf
10 ms
M__Wu4PAmHf4YZvQM8tWsDnFfol0SnfBMmbnmUK0fZM.ttf
10 ms
icomoon.woff
815 ms
collect
11 ms
collect
70 ms
ga-audiences
38 ms
faveton.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
faveton.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
faveton.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Faveton.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Spanish language. Our system also found out that Faveton.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
faveton.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Faveton. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: