6.7 sec in total
2.3 sec
4.3 sec
175 ms
Welcome to fdg.de homepage info - get ready to check FDG best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about fdg.de
Mit der Golf Fernmitgliedschaft vom FDG sparen Sie sich hohe Mitgliedschaftsgebühren für Golfanlagen. Jetzt günstig Golf spielen!
Visit fdg.deWe analyzed Fdg.de page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
fdg.de performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.6 s
5/100
10%
Value8.9 s
1/100
25%
Value7.6 s
26/100
10%
Value720 ms
41/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value9.4 s
31/100
10%
2256 ms
1008 ms
1103 ms
1016 ms
1016 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Fdg.de, 7% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Jensbuenger.de. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Fdg.de.
Page size can be reduced by 83.6 kB (54%)
154.5 kB
70.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Fdg.de main page is 154.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 52.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 39.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, FDG needs image optimization as it can save up to 12.2 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 32.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 60% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (85%)
40
6
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of FDG. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
fdg.de
2256 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1008 ms
woocommerce-mod.css
1103 ms
woocommerce-gzd-layout.min.css
1016 ms
frontend.css
1016 ms
grid.css
1010 ms
base.css
1011 ms
layout.css
1210 ms
shortcodes.css
1218 ms
magnific-popup.css
1126 ms
mediaelementplayer.css
1122 ms
custom.css
1125 ms
jquery.js
1303 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1228 ms
compat.min.js
1250 ms
frontend.js
1232 ms
avia-compat.js
1324 ms
woocommerce-mod.js
1333 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
1364 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
1365 ms
woocommerce.min.js
1365 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
1407 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
1413 ms
avia.js
1527 ms
shortcodes.js
1542 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.min.js
1445 ms
mediaelement-and-player.min.js
1548 ms
wp-mediaelement.js
1510 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1515 ms
frontend.min.js
1552 ms
country-select.min.js
1616 ms
address-i18n.min.js
1618 ms
revocation.min.js
1630 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1642 ms
analytics.js
6 ms
collect
30 ms
foerderverein-deutscher-golfsport-logo.png
460 ms
collect
6 ms
entypo-fontello.woff
419 ms
print.css
107 ms
lazyload.1.0.4.min.js
108 ms
fdg.de accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
fdg.de best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
fdg.de SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fdg.de can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fdg.de main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fdg.de
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of FDG. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: