Report Summary

  • 23

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    42% of other websites

  • 87

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 67% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

feednavigator.com

Animal feed - Nutrition, additives supplements, processing

Page Load Speed

7.5 sec in total

First Response

222 ms

Resources Loaded

6.7 sec

Page Rendered

575 ms

feednavigator.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Feed Navigator content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about feednavigator.com

Free access to news on animal feed and animal nutrition. From feed additives to animal feed processing, we cover the animal food industry for chicken, cattle, pigs.

Visit feednavigator.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Feednavigator.com page load time and found that the first response time was 222 ms and then it took 7.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

feednavigator.com performance score

23

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

35/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.9 s

33/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,720 ms

3/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.7 s

6/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

feednavigator.com

222 ms

www.feednavigator.com

289 ms

98da1c89de97c37d663e55ed119e0786_1454493131_all.css

174 ms

error.js

106 ms

8d68b43f88fec9c986e78d93dedd038b_1450366440.js

439 ms

Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 46% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Feednavigator.com, 12% (11 requests) were made to Sas.decisionnews.com and 10% (9 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.8 sec) relates to the external source Sas.decisionnews.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 648.9 kB (50%)

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

654.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Feednavigator.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 564.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 89.3 kB

  • Original 108.9 kB
  • After minification 90.7 kB
  • After compression 19.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.1 kB, which is 17% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 22.3 kB

  • Original 472.9 kB
  • After minification 450.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Feed Navigator images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 406.4 kB

  • Original 564.6 kB
  • After minification 526.8 kB
  • After compression 158.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 406.4 kB or 72% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 130.9 kB

  • Original 156.7 kB
  • After minification 154.7 kB
  • After compression 25.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Feednavigator.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 130.9 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (40%)

Requests Now

86

After Optimization

52

The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Feed Navigator. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

feednavigator.com accessibility score

87

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

feednavigator.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

feednavigator.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Feednavigator.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Feednavigator.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Feed Navigator. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: