Tools & Wizards About Us
filerecoveryafter.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

filerecoveryafter.com

Tool to Restore Lost Files | Recover Files after Deletion or Lost

Page Load Speed

3.9 sec in total

First Response

212 ms

Resources Loaded

2.7 sec

Page Rendered

1.1 sec

filerecoveryafter.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing File Recover Yafter content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about filerecoveryafter.com

Retrieve files on Windows & Mac OS X after accidentally deleted or formatting, Restore files by file recovery after computer crash,restoring factory settings or usage of rm command

Visit filerecoveryafter.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Filerecoveryafter.com page load time and found that the first response time was 212 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

filerecoveryafter.com performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

filerecoveryafter.com

212 ms

www.filerecoveryafter.com

204 ms

foundation.css

63 ms

logo.png

129 ms

box.png

236 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Filerecoveryafter.com, 5% (1 request) were made to Static.getclicky.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Filerecoveryafter.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 295.9 kB (59%)

Content Size

502.6 kB

After Optimization

206.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Filerecoveryafter.com main page is 502.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 435.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 14.1 kB

  • Original 18.9 kB
  • After minification 17.0 kB
  • After compression 4.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.1 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 277.0 kB

  • Original 435.9 kB
  • After minification 159.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, File Recover Yafter needs image optimization as it can save up to 277.0 kB or 64% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 42.3 kB
  • After minification 42.2 kB
  • After compression 39.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 1.4 kB

  • Original 5.4 kB
  • After minification 5.4 kB
  • After compression 4.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Filerecoveryafter.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.4 kB or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (44%)

Requests Now

18

After Optimization

10

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 18 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of File Recover Yafter. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

filerecoveryafter.com

filerecoveryafter.com

212 ms

www.filerecoveryafter.com

www.filerecoveryafter.com

204 ms

foundation.css

foundation.css

63 ms

logo.png

logo.png

129 ms

box.png

box.png

236 ms

home_icon.png

home_icon.png

127 ms

support_icon.png

support_icon.png

122 ms

img.png

img.png

902 ms

lightbox.css

lightbox.css

1902 ms

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

241 ms

lightbox.js

lightbox.js

179 ms

jquery.smooth.js

jquery.smooth.js

177 ms

filerecoveryafter-windows-step1.jpg

filerecoveryafter-windows-step1.jpg

355 ms

filerecoveryafter-windows-view-recovery.jpg

filerecoveryafter-windows-view-recovery.jpg

352 ms

box-bg.png

box-bg.png

303 ms

dow_logo.png

dow_logo.png

167 ms

win_logo.png

win_logo.png

172 ms

buy_logo.png

buy_logo.png

173 ms

mac_logo.png

mac_logo.png

174 ms

js

js

54 ms

SEO Factors

filerecoveryafter.com SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Filerecoveryafter.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Filerecoveryafter.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

filerecoveryafter.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of File Recover Yafter. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: