Tools & Wizards About Us
fitnessjournal.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 62

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 62

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

fitnessjournal.org

Fitness Journal - Online Exercise, Strength Training, Nutritional Log and daily fitness tracker

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

244 ms

Resources Loaded

630 ms

Page Rendered

162 ms

fitnessjournal.org screenshot

About Website

Welcome to fitnessjournal.org homepage info - get ready to check Fitness Journal best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about fitnessjournal.org

Visit fitnessjournal.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Fitnessjournal.org page load time and found that the first response time was 244 ms and then it took 792 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

fitnessjournal.org performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

16/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value850 ms

34/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.1 s

64/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

fitnessjournal.org

244 ms

tour.css

77 ms

plusone.js

100 ms

urchin.js

51 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

25 ms

Our browser made a total of 32 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 13% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Fitnessjournal.org, 47% (15 requests) were made to Images.fitnessjournal.org and 25% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (291 ms) relates to the external source Images.fitnessjournal.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 26.3 kB (14%)

Content Size

186.1 kB

After Optimization

159.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Fitnessjournal.org main page is 186.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 156.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 9.2 kB

  • Original 11.6 kB
  • After minification 10.2 kB
  • After compression 2.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 1.4 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.2 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 9.9 kB

  • Original 156.9 kB
  • After minification 147.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fitness Journal images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-40%

Potential reduce by 7.0 kB

  • Original 17.3 kB
  • After minification 17.3 kB
  • After compression 10.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 7.0 kB or 40% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 167 B

  • Original 340 B
  • After minification 261 B
  • After compression 173 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fitnessjournal.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 167 B or 49% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 8 (27%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

22

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fitness Journal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

fitnessjournal.org

fitnessjournal.org

244 ms

tour.css

tour.css

77 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

100 ms

urchin.js

urchin.js

51 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

25 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

18 ms

left_sidebar.jpg

left_sidebar.jpg

153 ms

226 ms

stat.cgi

stat.cgi

152 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

28 ms

fastbutton

fastbutton

70 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

145 ms

account_login.gif

account_login.gif

143 ms

menu_gradient.jpg

menu_gradient.jpg

175 ms

vertical_line.gif

vertical_line.gif

144 ms

running2.jpg

running2.jpg

291 ms

join_now_green.jpg

join_now_green.jpg

211 ms

usmc_button.jpg

usmc_button.jpg

250 ms

iphone_button.jpg

iphone_button.jpg

214 ms

media_button.jpg

media_button.jpg

215 ms

quicktime_tour.jpg

quicktime_tour.jpg

250 ms

wellness_button.jpg

wellness_button.jpg

284 ms

twitter_small.jpg

twitter_small.jpg

252 ms

facebook_small.jpg

facebook_small.jpg

251 ms

right_sidebar.jpg

right_sidebar.jpg

287 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

39 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

14 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

24 ms

3193398744-postmessagerelay.js

3193398744-postmessagerelay.js

63 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

26 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

11 ms

W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf

W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf

82 ms

Accessibility Review

fitnessjournal.org accessibility score

62

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

fitnessjournal.org best practices score

62

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

fitnessjournal.org SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fitnessjournal.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Fitnessjournal.org main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

fitnessjournal.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Fitness Journal. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: