5.3 sec in total
300 ms
4.1 sec
885 ms
Visit flightcomputer.net now to see the best up-to-date Flightcomputer content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about flightcomputer.net
Visit flightcomputer.netWe analyzed Flightcomputer.net page load time and found that the first response time was 300 ms and then it took 5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
flightcomputer.net performance score
300 ms
84 ms
142 ms
156 ms
167 ms
Our browser made a total of 149 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 14% of them (21 requests) were addressed to the original Flightcomputer.net, 13% (19 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 9% (14 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Static.xx.fbcdn.net.
Page size can be reduced by 872.2 kB (58%)
1.5 MB
624.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Flightcomputer.net main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 796.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.0 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Flightcomputer images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 492.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 492.4 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 310.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Flightcomputer.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 310.7 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 88 (63%)
140
52
The browser has sent 140 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Flightcomputer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 64 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
flightcomputer.net
300 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
84 ms
spu.css
142 ms
shortcodes.css
156 ms
style.css
167 ms
media-queries.css
170 ms
prettyPhoto.css
151 ms
jquery.js
274 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
245 ms
cevhershare.js
237 ms
all.js
483 ms
widgets.js
109 ms
plusone.js
109 ms
spu.js
215 ms
cevhershare.css
242 ms
adsbygoogle.js
27 ms
show_ads.js
45 ms
FB.Share
59 ms
widgets.js
131 ms
plusone.js
130 ms
in.js
48 ms
hostedbadge.php
167 ms
buttons.js
52 ms
hostedbadge.php
164 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
219 ms
carousel.min.js
331 ms
themify.script.js
309 ms
comment-reply.min.js
311 ms
button2.js
45 ms
button1.js
46 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
42 ms
rss.png
210 ms
home-icon.png
280 ms
StarTrek-FlightComputer.jpg
327 ms
flightcomputer.jpg
606 ms
sample-page-printable-e6b-flight-computer-150x150.jpg
208 ms
324 ms
xd_arbiter.php
402 ms
xd_arbiter.php
853 ms
ca-pub-7322625231787342.js
284 ms
zrt_lookup.html
340 ms
show_ads_impl.js
156 ms
secureAnonymousFramework
717 ms
widgets.js
314 ms
button2.html
293 ms
fastbutton
266 ms
button1.html
240 ms
ads
613 ms
osd.js
107 ms
ads
564 ms
ads
745 ms
button-embed.js
213 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
431 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
583 ms
like.php
430 ms
ads
637 ms
635 ms
624 ms
ads
520 ms
like.php
514 ms
button_info.json
515 ms
ga.js
386 ms
button.0308b81ff1714e446f674b5b9793f2cd.js
746 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
162 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_2
392 ms
fastbutton
451 ms
fastbutton
447 ms
badge
471 ms
getAllAppDefault.esi
378 ms
W5F8_SL0XFawnjxHGsZjJA.ttf
577 ms
TY3MhkXpWJ-.js
1143 ms
abg.js
606 ms
m_js_controller.js
881 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
590 ms
2342879205753993250
929 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
1134 ms
share
529 ms
sprite_connect_v14.png
482 ms
__utm.gif
145 ms
1451189153980751480
697 ms
TY3MhkXpWJ-.js
1073 ms
Cjiv3uvnIyI
688 ms
likebox.php
188 ms
postmessageRelay
853 ms
rs=AGLTcCMZQMkD3nQb9neyXrDGlfp1IpCqrw
97 ms
badge_su.js
569 ms
badges_su.css
622 ms
like.php
272 ms
rs=AGLTcCPxxcsaEHPLIxgGb9au86GYFsrXHA
165 ms
rs=AGLTcCP1XWuWX_iCC9WgWr0vKsRUFWxeag
227 ms
rs=AGLTcCON5xo3PJKQK4uCrXLJLysK2Nj1Xw
337 ms
getSegment.php
604 ms
checkOAuth.esi
318 ms
kyEKgjk51ZE.css
750 ms
xgj7bXhJNEH.css
741 ms
1kPfZUdGrka.js
747 ms
Yuj_Y8xNH2C.js
929 ms
Mpe38fuBVZ2.js
923 ms
n8qIhCw3vMx.js
929 ms
TY3MhkXpWJ-.js
1081 ms
x_button_blue2.png
368 ms
rs=AGLTcCON5xo3PJKQK4uCrXLJLysK2Nj1Xw
175 ms
dtpHsbgPEm2lVWciJZ0P-A.ttf
362 ms
bdHGHleUa-ndQCOrdpfxfw.ttf
537 ms
s
224 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
657 ms
www-embed-player.js
694 ms
base.js
851 ms
follow_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
279 ms
tweet_button.b9740740e0bcf9b0657c5b11bd4388da.en.html
469 ms
t.dhj
447 ms
favicon
625 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
330 ms
badgeRect50x60.png
381 ms
badgeRound65x18.png
381 ms
rs=AGLTcCON5xo3PJKQK4uCrXLJLysK2Nj1Xw
243 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
340 ms
info.json
906 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
479 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
391 ms
307461_107159792720181_2096867_n.jpg
865 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
251 ms
s7jcwEQH7Sx.png
250 ms
t.dhj
100 ms
cm
161 ms
x35248
581 ms
hbpix
409 ms
s-3271.xgi
336 ms
337 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
190 ms
ad_status.js
164 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
59 ms
index.a8fc48294ca4cc10eb440189d9f22d7c.html
142 ms
buttons.ab966a004186897711de4a5ed256c924.css
120 ms
getCount2.php
138 ms
pixel
62 ms
57 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
30 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
43 ms
sharethis_16.png
21 ms
st.125da8bfe70ad3e00a35a6e4c65d8bc5.js
22 ms
xrefid.xgi
13 ms
2981
64 ms
VXcANLwwL5J.js
79 ms
AmlxWlqMvlv.js
136 ms
ui
35 ms
activeview
31 ms
activeview
29 ms
jot.html
27 ms
flightcomputer.net SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Flightcomputer.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Flightcomputer.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
flightcomputer.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Flightcomputer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: