2.2 sec in total
527 ms
1.5 sec
161 ms
Visit flightkeeper.net now to see the best up-to-date Flight Keeper content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about flightkeeper.net
Visit flightkeeper.netWe analyzed Flightkeeper.net page load time and found that the first response time was 527 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
flightkeeper.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
81/100
10%
Value3.0 s
77/100
25%
Value2.9 s
95/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value2.6 s
98/100
10%
527 ms
272 ms
350 ms
238 ms
372 ms
Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (19 requests) were addressed to the original Flightkeeper.net, 5% (1 request) were made to Rum-static.pingdom.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (879 ms) belongs to the original domain Flightkeeper.net.
Page size can be reduced by 68.7 kB (39%)
177.1 kB
108.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Flightkeeper.net main page is 177.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 92.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Flight Keeper needs image optimization as it can save up to 9.7 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 32.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.8 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Flightkeeper.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.7 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (21%)
19
15
The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Flight Keeper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
flightkeeper.net
527 ms
default.css
272 ms
milonic_src.js
350 ms
tml_subarray.js
238 ms
tmlFLKeeper_array.js
372 ms
prum.min.js
21 ms
clearpixel.gif
176 ms
TMLHeader.jpg
456 ms
TMLSmall.gif
261 ms
LogoBig.jpg
879 ms
AeroOnline.jpg
357 ms
AeroLogo.jpg
259 ms
Avsim_5_stars.jpg
592 ms
deltafsfk.gif
363 ms
TMLCaptureThumb.jpg
500 ms
mmenudom.js
484 ms
Home.gif
190 ms
New.gif
118 ms
Blank10.gif
109 ms
arrow.gif
240 ms
flightkeeper.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
flightkeeper.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
flightkeeper.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
EN
EN
N/A
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Flightkeeper.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Flightkeeper.net main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
flightkeeper.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Flight Keeper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: