4 sec in total
1.3 sec
2.6 sec
197 ms
Click here to check amazing Foundation Life content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about foundationlife.com
Compare life insurance rates from carefully selected, highly rated and the most competitive life insurance carriers. Apply and buy online.
Visit foundationlife.comWe analyzed Foundationlife.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
foundationlife.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.2 s
8/100
10%
Value8.5 s
2/100
25%
Value11.4 s
5/100
10%
Value3,120 ms
2/100
30%
Value0.069
96/100
15%
Value14.5 s
8/100
10%
1262 ms
136 ms
167 ms
224 ms
33 ms
Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Foundationlife.com, 10% (4 requests) were made to Cm.g.doubleclick.net and 7% (3 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source Insuranceinminutes.com.
Page size can be reduced by 352.3 kB (48%)
731.4 kB
379.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Foundationlife.com main page is 731.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 378.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 106.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.0 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 106.8 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 6.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Foundation Life images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 234.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 234.2 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Foundationlife.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (42%)
36
21
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Foundation Life. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.insuranceinminutes.com
1262 ms
css-style.css
136 ms
BubbleTooltips.js
167 ms
AC_RunActiveContent.js
224 ms
addthis_widget.js
33 ms
cleanValidator.js
82 ms
getSeal
416 ms
lg-share-en.gif
16 ms
shadow_left.gif
68 ms
logo.png
190 ms
banner.gif
165 ms
title-bg.jpg
155 ms
help.png
363 ms
lock.jpg
138 ms
arrow.png
132 ms
arrow-01.gif
200 ms
friend.gif
214 ms
logos.jpg
324 ms
ban2.jpg
325 ms
dot.png
467 ms
head.jpg
323 ms
main.png
947 ms
texban.gif
388 ms
gua.jpg
396 ms
as.jpg
409 ms
test.gif
548 ms
bg.jpg
427 ms
title-bg1.jpg
202 ms
siteseal_gd_3_h_d_m.gif
67 ms
ga.js
6 ms
300lo.json
51 ms
__utm.gif
40 ms
shadow_right.gif
154 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
37 ms
collect
54 ms
pixel
18 ms
pixel
19 ms
match-result
5 ms
pixel
17 ms
pixel
14 ms
bt.css
74 ms
foundationlife.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
foundationlife.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
foundationlife.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Foundationlife.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Foundationlife.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
foundationlife.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Foundation Life. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: