5.3 sec in total
650 ms
4 sec
592 ms
Click here to check amazing Fourmark content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about fourmark.com
Revolutionizing Injection Moulding Excellence. PAC Global Innovation Award Winner. Just in time deliery guarantee.
Visit fourmark.comWe analyzed Fourmark.com page load time and found that the first response time was 650 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
fourmark.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
50/100
10%
Value3.0 s
78/100
25%
Value19.9 s
0/100
10%
Value270 ms
82/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.1 s
20/100
10%
650 ms
61 ms
120 ms
186 ms
179 ms
Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (80 requests) were addressed to the original Fourmark.com, 13% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Fourmark.com.
Page size can be reduced by 156.0 kB (6%)
2.5 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Fourmark.com main page is 2.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 89.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 89.1 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 66.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fourmark images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 156 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 624 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fourmark.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (45%)
78
43
The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fourmark. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
fourmark.com
650 ms
style.min.css
61 ms
theme.min.css
120 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
186 ms
post-6.css
179 ms
elementor-icons.min.css
182 ms
swiper.min.css
179 ms
frontend-lite.min.css
180 ms
global.css
183 ms
post-11.css
241 ms
post-62.css
239 ms
post-316.css
242 ms
css
27 ms
fontawesome.min.css
244 ms
solid.min.css
243 ms
brands.min.css
243 ms
jquery.min.js
303 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
298 ms
widget-nav-menu.min.css
299 ms
widget-carousel.min.css
298 ms
post-298.css
298 ms
animations.min.css
299 ms
hello-frontend.min.js
426 ms
jquery.smartmenus.min.js
428 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
427 ms
webpack-pro.runtime.min.js
428 ms
webpack.runtime.min.js
428 ms
frontend-modules.min.js
429 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
429 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
430 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
506 ms
hooks.min.js
429 ms
i18n.min.js
430 ms
frontend.min.js
431 ms
waypoints.min.js
480 ms
core.min.js
482 ms
frontend.min.js
485 ms
elements-handlers.min.js
485 ms
fourmark-logo.png
192 ms
innovation.png
206 ms
on-time.png
206 ms
sustainability.png
207 ms
cutting-edge.png
208 ms
reliability.png
209 ms
why-change.jpg
385 ms
fourmark-icon.png
261 ms
video-poster-1.jpg
321 ms
just-in-time.png
2588 ms
more-efficient.jpg
263 ms
environmental.jpg
322 ms
food-packaging.png
320 ms
health-beauty.png
323 ms
medical.png
380 ms
commercial.png
380 ms
one.png
382 ms
two.png
382 ms
three.png
439 ms
four.png
353 ms
innovation.jpg
470 ms
improved.jpg
354 ms
leaders.jpg
355 ms
shippment.jpg
467 ms
black-decker-1.png
409 ms
bosch-1.png
411 ms
chapmans-1.png
411 ms
delmonte-1.png
467 ms
fontaine-1.png
470 ms
gsk-1.png
469 ms
KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf
21 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf
37 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmSU5fBBc9.ttf
47 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1MmgVxIIzc.ttf
51 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmWUlfBBc9.ttf
49 ms
KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmYUtfBBc9.ttf
49 ms
eicons.woff
750 ms
KFOkCnqEu92Fr1Mu51xIIzc.ttf
49 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51S7ACc6CsE.ttf
45 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TjASc6CsE.ttf
88 ms
KFOiCnqEu92Fr1Mu51QrEzAdKg.ttf
89 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TzBic6CsE.ttf
89 ms
KFOjCnqEu92Fr1Mu51TLBCc6CsE.ttf
89 ms
fa-brands-400.woff
590 ms
kruger-1.png
474 ms
liberte-1.png
475 ms
nestle-1.png
476 ms
pepsi-1.png
493 ms
pg-1.png
480 ms
richardson-1.png
479 ms
walmart-1.png
539 ms
haagen-2.png
538 ms
club-coffee-2.png
538 ms
fourmark-logo-cl.png
587 ms
New_FDO_FundingLine_horizontal_BIL-EN-1024x116.jpg
539 ms
fourmark.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
fourmark.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
fourmark.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fourmark.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fourmark.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fourmark.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fourmark. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: