7 sec in total
455 ms
3.7 sec
2.8 sec
Click here to check amazing Future Camp content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about futurecamp.vision
future.camp® is a competence center for sustainable lifestyles, based in Zürich, Switzerland. It conveys concepts and solutions that allow consumers of the future to actively influence the environment...
Visit futurecamp.visionWe analyzed Futurecamp.vision page load time and found that the first response time was 455 ms and then it took 6.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
futurecamp.vision performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.4 s
0/100
10%
Value9.1 s
1/100
25%
Value9.0 s
14/100
10%
Value1,780 ms
10/100
30%
Value0.007
100/100
15%
Value11.4 s
19/100
10%
455 ms
97 ms
101 ms
181 ms
672 ms
Our browser made a total of 15 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 27% of them (4 requests) were addressed to the original Futurecamp.vision, 20% (3 requests) were made to Components.mywebsitebuilder.com and 20% (3 requests) were made to Storage.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source Webzaitest.blob.core.windows.net.
Page size can be reduced by 266.9 kB (4%)
7.0 MB
6.7 MB
In fact, the total size of Futurecamp.vision main page is 7.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 6.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 137.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 137.7 kB or 88% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 129.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Future Camp images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 0 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 146 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Futurecamp.vision has all CSS files already compressed.
We found no issues to fix!
11
11
The browser has sent 11 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Future Camp. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
futurecamp.vision
455 ms
t.js
97 ms
viewer.css
101 ms
viewer.js
181 ms
d34f2f7cea804a8bb1eba871d5c34260.js
672 ms
3834e08b16c54cad85afeca303477b85.js
678 ms
a259656b6f1942e980e6c1d2f7b59e29.js
736 ms
localize.sitey.com
828 ms
419 ms
939 ms
497 ms
JYwDjrpa8U6xfI7FKlWegw.woff
694 ms
ALyKWGaVsEemWmMSYxY8yg.woff
799 ms
yt_icon_rgb.png
204 ms
webzai-icons.woff
1024 ms
futurecamp.vision accessibility score
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
futurecamp.vision best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
futurecamp.vision SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Futurecamp.vision can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Futurecamp.vision main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
futurecamp.vision
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Future Camp. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: