2.4 sec in total
144 ms
2 sec
234 ms
Visit web.fatmap.com now to see the best up-to-date Web FATMAP content for Spain and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about web.fatmap.com
Plan your next route like a pro and find 1000s of routes from our community of guides, athletes and locals. With a free online route planner and GPX export.
Visit web.fatmap.comWe analyzed Web.fatmap.com page load time and found that the first response time was 144 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
web.fatmap.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value13.3 s
0/100
10%
Value33.7 s
0/100
25%
Value28.6 s
0/100
10%
Value14,920 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.25
49/100
15%
Value35.1 s
0/100
10%
144 ms
92 ms
193 ms
175 ms
316 ms
Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Web.fatmap.com, 10% (3 requests) were made to Fatmap.com and 10% (3 requests) were made to Js.stripe.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (602 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.wootric.com.
Page size can be reduced by 8.8 kB (26%)
34.4 kB
25.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Web.fatmap.com main page is 34.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 21.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 8.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 8.8 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 50 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (57%)
28
12
The browser has sent 28 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Web FATMAP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
web.fatmap.com
144 ms
fatmap.com
92 ms
gtm.js
193 ms
css
175 ms
aws-sdk-2.215.1.min.js
316 ms
fatmap.js
166 ms
rudder-analytics.min.js
175 ms
8c35443bc407463635f3.css
145 ms
snippet.js
286 ms
appleid.auth.js
522 ms
268 ms
38d056ed3070f8785c69.js
515 ms
analytics.js
293 ms
polyfill.min.js
488 ms
css
107 ms
ins.js
531 ms
datahappy.js
496 ms
collect
328 ms
fbevents.js
413 ms
wootric-sdk.js
602 ms
m-outer-75d43c2e886cc6ccd658213a3f01bfcc.html
34 ms
40d6be0f-72c3-428f-a155-8f45d6e777f1
342 ms
collect
321 ms
m-outer-acce27bb37678bf915642b16241314a7.js
52 ms
inner.html
380 ms
1779414599022151
302 ms
worker-new.html
178 ms
ga-audiences
328 ms
1664904408577c268681589.e4a848e0
309 ms
web-widget-framework-96c2ac7dafdad68c4a30.js
24 ms
web.fatmap.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
web.fatmap.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
web.fatmap.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Web.fatmap.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Web.fatmap.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
web.fatmap.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Web FATMAP. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: