3.8 sec in total
1.3 sec
2.3 sec
169 ms
Welcome to gadgetguard.com homepage info - get ready to check Gadget Guard best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about gadgetguard.com
gadget guard, gadget guard screen protectors, screen protectors, screen protection, alara, cellphone radiation
Visit gadgetguard.comWe analyzed Gadgetguard.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
gadgetguard.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.5 s
15/100
10%
Value34.9 s
0/100
25%
Value25.4 s
0/100
10%
Value7,010 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.139
79/100
15%
Value70.1 s
0/100
10%
1313 ms
67 ms
73 ms
75 ms
102 ms
Our browser made a total of 110 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (105 requests) were addressed to the original Gadgetguard.com, 2% (2 requests) were made to Verify.authorize.net and 2% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Gadgetguard.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (54%)
2.2 MB
1.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Gadgetguard.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 65.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.0 kB, which is 24% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 65.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 79.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Gadget Guard needs image optimization as it can save up to 79.9 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 823.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 823.4 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 244.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gadgetguard.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 244.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 48 (44%)
109
61
The browser has sent 109 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gadget Guard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 32 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.gadgetguard.com
1313 ms
uniform.default.css
67 ms
anythingslider.css
73 ms
jquery.ad-gallery.css
75 ms
new.css
102 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
77 ms
jquery-1.10.1.min.js
190 ms
modernizr.custom.js
101 ms
custom.js
107 ms
jquery-1.4.2.min.js
224 ms
jquery-noconflict.js
118 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.24.custom.css
165 ms
default.css
132 ms
pascal.css
137 ms
orman.css
148 ms
nivo-slider.css
163 ms
shadowbox.css
171 ms
styles.css
243 ms
widgets.css
218 ms
responsive.css
236 ms
style.css
233 ms
creare_latesttweet.css
233 ms
prototype.js
352 ms
ccard.js
237 ms
validation.js
304 ms
builder.js
257 ms
effects.js
288 ms
dragdrop.js
264 ms
controls.js
269 ms
slider.js
277 ms
js.js
299 ms
form.js
302 ms
menu.js
308 ms
translate.js
319 ms
cookies.js
334 ms
shadowbox.js
381 ms
seal.js
34 ms
topDevices.css
285 ms
jquery-1.7.1.min.js
333 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js
326 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.24.custom.min.js
411 ms
jquery.ad-gallery.js
320 ms
jquery.anythingslider.js
316 ms
organictabs.jquery.js
317 ms
jquery.uniform.js
319 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js
306 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
300 ms
slideMenu.js
296 ms
footer-bg2.jpg
70 ms
ga.js
33 ms
header-bg.jpg
68 ms
search-icon.png
67 ms
logo.jpg
64 ms
small_logo.png
68 ms
mobile_logo.png
65 ms
cart-icon.png
69 ms
submenu-bg.png
71 ms
morpeth-black-webfont.woff
67 ms
morpeth-light-webfont.woff
67 ms
morpeth-semibold-webfont.woff
67 ms
ajax-loader.gif
68 ms
2015_0914_iPhone_6s_Slider.jpg
141 ms
GG_SE.jpg
141 ms
2015_0914_Black_Ice_Slider.jpg
142 ms
2015_0916_Warranty_Slide_Banner_1000x400.jpg
143 ms
2015_1202_TechTonic_Slide_Banner_1000x400.jpg
146 ms
yellow-graphic-arrow.png
139 ms
gg_apple_iphone_5_5s_5c_blackice.jpg
146 ms
gg_bie_apple_iphone_6_800x1035.jpg
146 ms
gg_bie_samsung_galaxy_s6_800x1035.jpg
151 ms
gg_bie_lg_g4_800x1035.jpg
158 ms
gg_bie_samsung_galaxy_note_5_800x1035.jpg
168 ms
gg_bie_lg_g_stylo_800x1035.jpg
178 ms
1_11macbookair_2011_thumb.jpg
177 ms
gg_oe_apple_iphone_6_casefriendly_800x1035.jpg
175 ms
gg_se_apple_iphone_6_800x1035.jpg
184 ms
gg_oe_apple_watch_800x1035.jpg
190 ms
gg_bie_apple_ipad_mini_4_800x1035.jpg
200 ms
gg_oe_apple_ipad_pro_800x1035.jpg
207 ms
gg_samsung_galaxy_s5_black_ice.jpg
209 ms
gg_oe_samsung_galaxy_s6_active_800x1035.jpg
211 ms
gg_bie_samsung_galaxy_core_prime_800x1035.jpg
215 ms
gg_oe_samsung_galaxy_tab_s2_9_7_800x1035.jpg
227 ms
gg_bie_motorola_droid_maxx2_800x1035.jpg
234 ms
gg_bie_lg_g4_800x1035_5_2.jpg
241 ms
__utm.gif
14 ms
gg_oe_nokia_lumia_635_800x1035.jpg
202 ms
gg_oe_nokia_lumia_1320_800x1035.jpg
219 ms
gg_oe_nokia_lumia_830_800x1035.jpg
218 ms
gg_oe_microsoft_lumia_640_800x1035.jpg
222 ms
gg_oe_microsoft_surface_pro_4_800x1035.jpg
236 ms
gg_oe_microsoft_lumia_950_800x1035_1.jpg
236 ms
video-img.png
236 ms
mo-icons.png
236 ms
linkdin.png
228 ms
youtube.png
244 ms
fb.png
260 ms
tw.png
247 ms
secure90x72.gif
58 ms
gg-logo.png
189 ms
yellow-arrow.png
187 ms
curve-popular-gadget-bg.png
189 ms
gray-bg.jpg
203 ms
yellow-graphic-arrow2.png
218 ms
footer-top-bg.jpg
218 ms
select-combo-bg.png
213 ms
select-combo-arrow.png
216 ms
default.png
214 ms
print.css
34 ms
roundtrip.js
7 ms
gadgetguard.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
gadgetguard.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
gadgetguard.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gadgetguard.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gadgetguard.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gadgetguard.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gadget Guard. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: