Tools & Wizards About Us
gazingcat.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 21

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    39% of other websites

  • 100

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 97% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

gazingcat.com

Videography and video production you'll love - Gazing Cat Productions

Page Load Speed

5.9 sec in total

First Response

1.2 sec

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

gazingcat.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Gazing Cat content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gazingcat.com

Superior videography and video production services in central North Carolina, serving everyone from Asheboro to Greensboro to Raleigh to Sanford.

Visit gazingcat.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gazingcat.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.2 sec and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gazingcat.com performance score

21

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.7 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.9 s

10/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,560 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.03

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value21.7 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.gazingcat.com

1215 ms

style.min.css

167 ms

styles.css

80 ms

font-libre-franklin.css

82 ms

style.css

182 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Gazingcat.com, 13% (7 requests) were made to Youtube.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Gazingcat.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 538.0 kB (14%)

Content Size

3.8 MB

After Optimization

3.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gazingcat.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 79.6 kB

  • Original 110.8 kB
  • After minification 108.4 kB
  • After compression 31.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 79.6 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 31.6 kB

  • Original 2.9 MB
  • After minification 2.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gazing Cat images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 213.8 kB

  • Original 549.8 kB
  • After minification 543.6 kB
  • After compression 336.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 213.8 kB or 39% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 213.0 kB

  • Original 304.3 kB
  • After minification 277.0 kB
  • After compression 91.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gazingcat.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 213.0 kB or 70% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (70%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

13

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gazing Cat. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.gazingcat.com

www.gazingcat.com

1215 ms

style.min.css

style.min.css

167 ms

styles.css

styles.css

80 ms

font-libre-franklin.css

font-libre-franklin.css

82 ms

style.css

style.css

182 ms

blocks.css

blocks.css

84 ms

colors-dark.css

colors-dark.css

99 ms

ytprefs.min.css

ytprefs.min.css

153 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

234 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

163 ms

global.js

global.js

147 ms

navigation.js

navigation.js

191 ms

ytprefs.min.js

ytprefs.min.js

210 ms

index.js

index.js

187 ms

index.js

index.js

179 ms

jquery.scrollTo.js

jquery.scrollTo.js

296 ms

fitvids.min.js

fitvids.min.js

295 ms

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

wp-polyfill-inert.min.js

295 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

296 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

346 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

302 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

302 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

302 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

301 ms

wp-custom-header.min.js

wp-custom-header.min.js

301 ms

FP7qUk3_1UE

FP7qUk3_1UE

213 ms

cropped-IMG_1650_cropped_edited_minimal.jpg

cropped-IMG_1650_cropped_edited_minimal.jpg

253 ms

cropped-Gazing-Cat-logo-illustration-inverted-outlined-transparent.png

cropped-Gazing-Cat-logo-illustration-inverted-outlined-transparent.png

189 ms

20190111_205217_scaled.jpg

20190111_205217_scaled.jpg

222 ms

IMG_7085_scaled_edited_small.jpg

IMG_7085_scaled_edited_small.jpg

215 ms

P1030708_scaled_edited_minimal.jpg

P1030708_scaled_edited_minimal.jpg

469 ms

P1000249_scaled_edited.jpg

P1000249_scaled_edited.jpg

225 ms

Gazing-Cat-color-correction-demo.jpg

Gazing-Cat-color-correction-demo.jpg

591 ms

IMG_5441_cropped_edited_minimal.jpg

IMG_5441_cropped_edited_minimal.jpg

592 ms

IMG_4716_cropped_edited_minimal.jpg

IMG_4716_cropped_edited_minimal.jpg

590 ms

libre-franklin-all-400-normal.woff

libre-franklin-all-400-normal.woff

535 ms

libre-franklin-all-300-normal.woff

libre-franklin-all-300-normal.woff

413 ms

libre-franklin-all-600-normal.woff

libre-franklin-all-600-normal.woff

534 ms

libre-franklin-all-800-normal.woff

libre-franklin-all-800-normal.woff

535 ms

libre-franklin-all-400-italic.woff

libre-franklin-all-400-italic.woff

537 ms

libre-franklin-all-300-italic.woff

libre-franklin-all-300-italic.woff

536 ms

libre-franklin-all-600-italic.woff

libre-franklin-all-600-italic.woff

537 ms

libre-franklin-all-800-italic.woff

libre-franklin-all-800-italic.woff

537 ms

iframe_api

iframe_api

54 ms

www-player.css

www-player.css

38 ms

www-embed-player.js

www-embed-player.js

62 ms

base.js

base.js

108 ms

www-widgetapi.js

www-widgetapi.js

31 ms

ad_status.js

ad_status.js

202 ms

QIgJXlTW_ocH5BKR4VvT459F7KnrK51w4wqraUAmDYI.js

QIgJXlTW_ocH5BKR4VvT459F7KnrK51w4wqraUAmDYI.js

153 ms

embed.js

embed.js

73 ms

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

KFOmCnqEu92Fr1Mu4mxP.ttf

48 ms

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

KFOlCnqEu92Fr1MmEU9fBBc9.ttf

49 ms

id

id

24 ms

Accessibility Review

gazingcat.com accessibility score

100

Accessibility Issues

Best Practices

gazingcat.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

gazingcat.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gazingcat.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gazingcat.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

gazingcat.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Gazing Cat. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: