4.3 sec in total
537 ms
2.6 sec
1.2 sec
Visit gestup.ma now to see the best up-to-date GESTUP content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gestup.ma
Gestup Progiciel en ligne: Un logiciel de gestion de facturation, gestion commerciale, gestion d'entreprise, gestion de la Relation Client, gestion de Stock
Visit gestup.maWe analyzed Gestup.ma page load time and found that the first response time was 537 ms and then it took 3.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
gestup.ma performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.2 s
3/100
10%
Value9.8 s
0/100
25%
Value13.9 s
1/100
10%
Value4,740 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.9 s
17/100
10%
537 ms
26 ms
43 ms
95 ms
91 ms
Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Gestup.ma, 34% (36 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 11% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (734 ms) belongs to the original domain Gestup.ma.
Page size can be reduced by 1.2 MB (30%)
4.0 MB
2.8 MB
In fact, the total size of Gestup.ma main page is 4.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 231.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. GESTUP images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 706.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 706.2 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 206.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gestup.ma needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 206.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (39%)
89
54
The browser has sent 89 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of GESTUP. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gestup.ma
537 ms
css
26 ms
css
43 ms
styles.css
95 ms
1200.css
91 ms
social.css
92 ms
flexslider.css
95 ms
font-awesome.css
119 ms
prettyPhoto.css
92 ms
shortcodes.css
168 ms
theme.css
216 ms
rnr-animate.css
194 ms
media.css
159 ms
style.css
159 ms
gestup.png
193 ms
paperplane.png
225 ms
lab.png
210 ms
like.png
235 ms
assistance.png
278 ms
floppy.png
278 ms
sanseng.png
279 ms
boxfacturation.png
344 ms
boxcommercial.png
399 ms
boxentreprise.png
420 ms
boxcrm.png
375 ms
jquery-1.4.2.js
438 ms
jquery.min.js
378 ms
jquery.scrollto.js
395 ms
jquery.form.min.js
456 ms
scripts.js
457 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
455 ms
jquery.queryloader2.js
471 ms
init.js
656 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.js
487 ms
script.js
531 ms
ajax-portfolio.js
506 ms
shortcodes.js
520 ms
js
79 ms
infobox.js
44 ms
home-parallax.jpg
587 ms
pattern.png
366 ms
1.jpg
588 ms
6.jpg
630 ms
4.jpg
734 ms
yYRnAC2KygoXnEC8IdU0gQLUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf
7 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTcDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
11 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSsDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
23 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzMDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
23 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-hsDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf
21 ms
soZfbn11PkChMcyPRwvf0evvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
20 ms
l1cOQ90roY9yC7voEhngDCZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
21 ms
dI-qzxlKVQA6TUC5RKSb3yZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
19 ms
BebasNeue-webfont.woff
391 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
530 ms
mail.png
334 ms
selectmenu.png
89 ms
common.js
21 ms
map.js
52 ms
util.js
80 ms
marker.js
81 ms
1888472_1460031180884516_304782613_n.png
550 ms
overlay.js
79 ms
onion.js
17 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
81 ms
stats.js
30 ms
controls.js
34 ms
transparent.png
126 ms
css
141 ms
pinMap.png
347 ms
google4.png
50 ms
mapcnt6.png
57 ms
sv5.png
57 ms
openhand_8_8.cur
58 ms
vt
67 ms
vt
77 ms
vt
60 ms
vt
60 ms
vt
58 ms
vt
75 ms
vt
76 ms
vt
77 ms
vt
78 ms
vt
85 ms
vt
88 ms
vt
91 ms
vt
100 ms
vt
113 ms
vt
92 ms
vt
128 ms
vt
127 ms
vt
125 ms
vt
127 ms
vt
141 ms
vt
128 ms
vt
156 ms
vt
143 ms
vt
135 ms
vt
141 ms
tmapctrl.png
29 ms
cb_scout5.png
30 ms
tmapctrl4.png
34 ms
imgs8.png
36 ms
QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
23 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
29 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
43 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOCZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
43 ms
AuthenticationService.Authenticate
202 ms
gestup.ma accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
gestup.ma best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
gestup.ma SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
FR
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gestup.ma can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Gestup.ma main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gestup.ma
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of GESTUP. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: