3.3 sec in total
510 ms
2.5 sec
289 ms
Click here to check amazing Gipper content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gipper.ru
Поиск и продвижение товаров в интернет магазинах России. Большой выбор товаров из популярных интернет магазинов - gipper.ru
Visit gipper.ruWe analyzed Gipper.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 510 ms and then it took 2.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
gipper.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.3 s
74/100
10%
Value2.3 s
93/100
25%
Value3.4 s
90/100
10%
Value1,020 ms
26/100
30%
Value0.039
99/100
15%
Value8.9 s
34/100
10%
510 ms
252 ms
35 ms
1075 ms
775 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 49% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Gipper.ru, 47% (35 requests) were made to P.gipper.ru and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) relates to the external source P.gipper.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 66.1 kB (10%)
646.0 kB
579.9 kB
In fact, the total size of Gipper.ru main page is 646.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 365.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 41.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 41.6 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 22.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gipper images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 481 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gipper.ru has all CSS files already compressed.
We found no issues to fix!
74
74
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gipper. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
gipper.ru
510 ms
gipper.css
252 ms
css2
35 ms
context.js
1075 ms
gipper.js
775 ms
200x200
617 ms
200x200
614 ms
200x200
611 ms
200x200
608 ms
200x200
611 ms
200x200
609 ms
200x200
687 ms
200x200
690 ms
200x200
698 ms
200x200
717 ms
200x200
715 ms
200x200
754 ms
200x200
811 ms
200x200
829 ms
200x200
828 ms
200x200
864 ms
200x200
855 ms
200x200
889 ms
200x200
964 ms
200x200
967 ms
200x200
966 ms
200x200
986 ms
200x200
1002 ms
200x200
1089 ms
200x200
1099 ms
200x200
1104 ms
200x200
1099 ms
200x200
1124 ms
200x200
1149 ms
200x200
1183 ms
200x200
1224 ms
200x200
1227 ms
200x200
1234 ms
200x200
1254 ms
200x200
1279 ms
main-top-category.jpg
157 ms
timthumb.php
300 ms
timthumb.php
374 ms
timthumb.php
384 ms
timthumb.php
377 ms
timthumb.php
378 ms
timthumb.php
429 ms
timthumb.php
599 ms
timthumb.php
598 ms
timthumb.php
599 ms
timthumb.php
600 ms
timthumb.php
603 ms
timthumb.php
620 ms
timthumb.php
639 ms
timthumb.php
650 ms
timthumb.php
643 ms
timthumb.php
655 ms
timthumb.php
686 ms
timthumb.php
749 ms
timthumb.php
770 ms
timthumb.php
773 ms
timthumb.php
786 ms
timthumb.php
785 ms
timthumb.php
812 ms
timthumb.php
878 ms
timthumb.php
907 ms
timthumb.php
909 ms
timthumb.php
915 ms
timthumb.php
922 ms
timthumb.php
943 ms
timthumb.php
1007 ms
timthumb.php
1038 ms
timthumb.php
1039 ms
tag.js
812 ms
ajax-categories
479 ms
gipper.ru accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
gipper.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
gipper.ru SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RU
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gipper.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gipper.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gipper.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gipper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: