3.7 sec in total
372 ms
2.8 sec
529 ms
Welcome to goldenretriever.services homepage info - get ready to check Goldenretriever best content right away, or after learning these important things about goldenretriever.services
Visit goldenretriever.servicesWe analyzed Goldenretriever.services page load time and found that the first response time was 372 ms and then it took 3.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
goldenretriever.services performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
35/100
10%
Value7.4 s
4/100
25%
Value7.5 s
27/100
10%
Value1,350 ms
17/100
30%
Value0.195
63/100
15%
Value14.2 s
9/100
10%
372 ms
761 ms
95 ms
190 ms
277 ms
Our browser made a total of 73 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Goldenretriever.services, 63% (46 requests) were made to Webscraping.amsterdam and 19% (14 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (826 ms) relates to the external source Webscraping.amsterdam.
Page size can be reduced by 217.5 kB (21%)
1.0 MB
820.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Goldenretriever.services main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 444.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 105.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 105.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 101.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Goldenretriever needs image optimization as it can save up to 101.3 kB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 8.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 1.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Goldenretriever.services has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (84%)
56
9
The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Goldenretriever. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 34 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
goldenretriever.services
372 ms
webscraping.amsterdam
761 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
95 ms
style.min.css
190 ms
wc-blocks-vendors-style.css
277 ms
wc-blocks-style.css
386 ms
classic-themes.min.css
275 ms
styles.css
281 ms
cookie-law-info-public.css
281 ms
cookie-law-info-gdpr.css
282 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
369 ms
woocommerce.css
370 ms
woocommerce.css
376 ms
style.min.css
467 ms
theme.bundle.min.css
395 ms
jquery.min.js
552 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
462 ms
cookie-law-info-public.js
485 ms
woo.js
485 ms
companion.bundle.min.js
484 ms
index.js
573 ms
index.js
573 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
573 ms
js.cookie.min.js
573 ms
woocommerce.min.js
573 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
639 ms
api.js
35 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
653 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
653 ms
index.js
654 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
653 ms
masonry.min.js
654 ms
theme.bundle.min.js
826 ms
dom-ready.min.js
757 ms
hooks.min.js
758 ms
i18n.min.js
758 ms
a11y.min.js
758 ms
wp-custom-header.min.js
759 ms
video-bg.js
826 ms
gtm.js
52 ms
companion.bundle.min.css
267 ms
css
31 ms
WSA-LOGO-100-1.png
278 ms
js
45 ms
ping.js
18 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsjZ0B4uaVc.ttf
21 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsiH0B4uaVc.ttf
26 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsgH1x4uaVc.ttf
31 ms
memSYaGs126MiZpBA-UvWbX2vVnXBbObj2OVZyOOSr4dVJWUgsg-1x4uaVc.ttf
30 ms
cropped-B-header-overal-pagina.png
244 ms
Bot-workflow.png
244 ms
wizzard.jpg
243 ms
volume.png
296 ms
video-poster.jpg
180 ms
julian-o-hayon-143085.jpg
165 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkpl0k50e0.ttf
67 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFlnl0k50e0.ttf
66 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFkQl0k50e0.ttf
148 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFnOkEk50e0.ttf
115 ms
7Aulp_0qiz-aVz7u3PJLcUMYOFmQkEk50e0.ttf
132 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
281 ms
7Aujp_0qiz-afTfcIyoiGtm2P0wG03Z04eSVxg.ttf
244 ms
7Aujp_0qiz-afTfcIyoiGtm2P0wG0zh04eSVxg.ttf
247 ms
7Aujp_0qiz-afTfcIyoiGtm2P0wG00904eSVxg.ttf
169 ms
7Aujp_0qiz-afTfcIyoiGtm2P0wG05Fz4eSVxg.ttf
244 ms
7Aujp_0qiz-afTfcIyoiGtm2P0wG089z4eSVxg.ttf
147 ms
recaptcha__en.js
180 ms
bootstrap.js
717 ms
6723263.js
165 ms
banner.js
105 ms
6723263.js
88 ms
fb.js
39 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
103 ms
goldenretriever.services accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
goldenretriever.services best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
goldenretriever.services SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
robots.txt is not valid
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
NL
NL
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Goldenretriever.services can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Dutch is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Goldenretriever.services main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
goldenretriever.services
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Goldenretriever. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: