1.1 sec in total
27 ms
891 ms
187 ms
Visit gracetoovillas.com now to see the best up-to-date Gracetoovillas content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gracetoovillas.com
Forsale Lander
Visit gracetoovillas.comWe analyzed Gracetoovillas.com page load time and found that the first response time was 27 ms and then it took 1.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.
gracetoovillas.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.7 s
59/100
10%
Value3.3 s
70/100
25%
Value10.9 s
6/100
10%
Value20,650 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value26.2 s
0/100
10%
27 ms
521 ms
90 ms
88 ms
14 ms
Our browser made a total of 28 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 4% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Gracetoovillas.com, 64% (18 requests) were made to Afternic.com and 25% (7 requests) were made to Img6.wsimg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (521 ms) relates to the external source Afternic.com.
Page size can be reduced by 76.6 kB (49%)
156.9 kB
80.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Gracetoovillas.com main page is 156.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 103.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.8 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 140 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gracetoovillas images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 8.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 8.9 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gracetoovillas.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 23 (88%)
26
3
The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gracetoovillas. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
gracetoovillas.com
27 ms
gracetoovillas.com
521 ms
uxcore2.min.css
90 ms
noheader.min.css
88 ms
c9302e26756e1a9a.css
14 ms
f3d7d266c35baf54.css
57 ms
8210b14763457e23.css
57 ms
polyfills-5cd94c89d3acac5f.js
73 ms
853.7d7067fffa72ef90.js
55 ms
webpack-008ffa3c98fc8544.js
73 ms
main-999f8182f179b553.js
78 ms
framework-f7ba292b22b03fed.js
77 ms
_app-74cd4fb80f14b27b.js
78 ms
670-e807ace496afef9f.js
83 ms
584-84fd276034ffe4bd.js
137 ms
787-b8887dd5c5d965da.js
228 ms
%5Bdomain%5D-0c2aac4ebf4cce77.js
138 ms
_buildManifest.js
226 ms
_ssgManifest.js
224 ms
_middlewareManifest.js
225 ms
polyfill.min.js
135 ms
uxcore2.min.js
130 ms
vendor~uxcore2.min.js
132 ms
heartbeat.js
132 ms
noheader.min.js
132 ms
aksb.min.js
203 ms
image
172 ms
utag.js
179 ms
gracetoovillas.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
gracetoovillas.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
gracetoovillas.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Page is blocked from indexing
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gracetoovillas.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gracetoovillas.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gracetoovillas.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gracetoovillas. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: