2.5 sec in total
379 ms
1.9 sec
246 ms
Click here to check amazing Graphic Conservation content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about graphicconservation.com
We are art conservators specializing in the preservation and conservation of works of art on paper and parchment.
Visit graphicconservation.comWe analyzed Graphicconservation.com page load time and found that the first response time was 379 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
graphicconservation.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
54/100
10%
Value6.3 s
11/100
25%
Value13.8 s
1/100
10%
Value1,970 ms
8/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value20.8 s
2/100
10%
379 ms
56 ms
89 ms
86 ms
51 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (78 requests) were addressed to the original Graphicconservation.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 2% (2 requests) were made to Rw1.marchex.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (699 ms) belongs to the original domain Graphicconservation.com.
Page size can be reduced by 331.1 kB (3%)
10.2 MB
9.9 MB
In fact, the total size of Graphicconservation.com main page is 10.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 9.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 66.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 255.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Graphic Conservation images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 6.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 2.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Graphicconservation.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (34%)
91
60
The browser has sent 91 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Graphic Conservation. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.graphicconservation.com
379 ms
preset.css
56 ms
960.css
89 ms
style.css
86 ms
js
51 ms
style.min.css
124 ms
styles.css
123 ms
style.css
123 ms
jquery.min.js
195 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
128 ms
jquery.slider.js
128 ms
jquery.textfill.js
128 ms
home.js
193 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
193 ms
zl-multine-files.js
208 ms
jquery.retina.js
206 ms
global.js
208 ms
external-links.js
209 ms
smooth.scroll.js
208 ms
js
45 ms
number-changer.js
52 ms
index.js
206 ms
index.js
207 ms
api.js
34 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
207 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
209 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
235 ms
index.js
209 ms
fbevents.js
158 ms
js
136 ms
core.js
156 ms
logo02.png
289 ms
getnumdata.js
111 ms
header-bg.png
147 ms
restoration-bg.png
189 ms
restoration-separator.png
143 ms
Marriage-License-01_0.png
278 ms
Marriage-License-02_0.png
328 ms
Marriage-License-03.png
330 ms
Marriage-License-04.png
374 ms
Marriage-License-05.png
280 ms
stages-bg.png
278 ms
Diploma-01_0.png
315 ms
Diploma-02_0.png
300 ms
Diploma-03_0.png
316 ms
Diploma-04_0.png
360 ms
Diploma-05_0.png
352 ms
Toulouse-01.png
350 ms
Toulouse-02.png
516 ms
Toulouse-03.png
501 ms
Toulouse-04.png
389 ms
Toulouse-05.png
394 ms
Vellum-Doc-01_0.png
397 ms
Vellum-Doc-02_0.png
534 ms
Vellum-Doc-03.png
426 ms
Vellum-Doc-04.png
464 ms
13th-Amendment-01.png
481 ms
Thirteenth-signature_1.png
463 ms
13th-Amendment-02_0.png
509 ms
Gehrig-Photo-01.png
512 ms
Gehrig-Photo-02.png
528 ms
Gehrig-Photo-03.png
699 ms
Gehrig-Photo-04.png
553 ms
recaptcha__en.js
183 ms
Gehrig-Photo-05.png
555 ms
Lincoln-Painting-01.png
568 ms
Lincoln-Painting-02.png
562 ms
Lincoln-Painting-03.png
648 ms
Lincoln-Painting-04.png
568 ms
analytics.js
101 ms
Lincoln-Painting-05.png
515 ms
Elvis-Hat-01.png
464 ms
Elvis-Hat-02.png
515 ms
collect
77 ms
Elvis-Hat-03.png
355 ms
Elvis-Hat-04.png
362 ms
Elvis-Hat-05.png
370 ms
prev.png
380 ms
collect
12 ms
next.png
370 ms
ga-audiences
15 ms
slider-nav.png
365 ms
home-paper-tool.png
507 ms
no-image-broken.png
362 ms
rule.png
370 ms
aic-logo.png
361 ms
home-paper-hand.png
377 ms
filigree.png
370 ms
location.png
361 ms
001-facebook.png
343 ms
002-instagram.png
347 ms
003-linkedin.png
360 ms
graphicconservation.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
graphicconservation.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
graphicconservation.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Graphicconservation.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Graphicconservation.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
graphicconservation.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Graphic Conservation. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: