3.9 sec in total
630 ms
3 sec
278 ms
Click here to check amazing Grgprint content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about grgprint.com
grgprint Management. Experienced Printers in Leeds specialising in Large Format Litho Printing services and more. T: 0113 383 3888.
Visit grgprint.comWe analyzed Grgprint.com page load time and found that the first response time was 630 ms and then it took 3.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
grgprint.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.7 s
13/100
10%
Value4.9 s
28/100
25%
Value7.9 s
23/100
10%
Value220 ms
88/100
30%
Value0.156
74/100
15%
Value9.3 s
32/100
10%
630 ms
139 ms
165 ms
398 ms
163 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Grgprint.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (828 ms) belongs to the original domain Grgprint.com.
Page size can be reduced by 299.0 kB (19%)
1.6 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Grgprint.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 32.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Grgprint images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 2.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 2.8 kB or 13% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 229.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Grgprint.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 229.4 kB or 89% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (51%)
72
35
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Grgprint. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.grgprint.com
630 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
139 ms
widget.css
165 ms
www.grgprint.com
398 ms
styles.css
163 ms
css
34 ms
style.css
169 ms
css
45 ms
style.css
165 ms
jquery.js
325 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
239 ms
scrollTo.js
245 ms
jquery.form.min.js
246 ms
mailchimp.js
319 ms
mailchimp-widget-min.js
325 ms
pp.popup.js
433 ms
jay.css
326 ms
jay.js
429 ms
jquery.galleryview-3.0.css
430 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
431 ms
jquery.timers-1.2.js
431 ms
jquery.galleryview-3.0.min.js
500 ms
jquery-ui-1.8.9.custom.css
503 ms
plusone.js
65 ms
styles.css
516 ms
scrollable-horizontal.css
520 ms
scrollable-buttons.css
521 ms
scrollable-navigator.css
521 ms
jquery.js
714 ms
core.min.js
527 ms
widget.min.js
528 ms
tabs.min.js
528 ms
accordion.min.js
529 ms
comment-reply.min.js
538 ms
scripts.js
605 ms
idle-timer.min.js
607 ms
custom.js
607 ms
wp-embed.min.js
607 ms
ga.js
40 ms
__utm.gif
67 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
17 ms
collect
57 ms
Aboutus-banner1.png
484 ms
gplus-64.png
237 ms
header_bg.png
237 ms
logo.png
241 ms
search_input.png
237 ms
search_btn.png
238 ms
nav_left.png
239 ms
nav_bg.png
230 ms
border.png
232 ms
nav_right.png
232 ms
mid_bg.png
233 ms
slider_nav.png
234 ms
spacer_new.gif
231 ms
border2.png
246 ms
request.png
247 ms
get_in_touch.png
247 ms
ph_img.png
247 ms
message.png
248 ms
facebook.png
249 ms
twitter.png
310 ms
rss.png
313 ms
footer_logo.png
311 ms
WhyChooseus-banner1.png
669 ms
LargeFormatLitho-banner1.png
593 ms
Testimonials-slider-banner1.png
588 ms
PrintBlog-banner1.png
591 ms
thomas-cook.jpg
267 ms
cmyk-logo-WestOfScot.jpg
349 ms
border1.png
289 ms
img_bg.png
295 ms
footer_bg.png
295 ms
border3.png
708 ms
tUrrMQoBrJbKyZFfX9xzeQ.ttf
191 ms
ARIMO-REGULAR.woff
828 ms
BkZwJXYnumPMepfEA344yQ.ttf
14 ms
grgprint.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
grgprint.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
grgprint.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Grgprint.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Grgprint.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
grgprint.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Grgprint. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: