1.7 sec in total
78 ms
1.5 sec
135 ms
Click here to check amazing Grommet content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about grommet.com
Doug Mockett & Company, Inc.
Visit grommet.comWe analyzed Grommet.com page load time and found that the first response time was 78 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
grommet.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.8 s
12/100
10%
Value18.0 s
0/100
25%
Value9.9 s
9/100
10%
Value5,260 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.403
25/100
15%
Value20.3 s
2/100
10%
78 ms
193 ms
40 ms
44 ms
38 ms
Our browser made a total of 201 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Grommet.com, 88% (177 requests) were made to Mockett.com and 5% (10 requests) were made to Js.klevu.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (526 ms) relates to the external source Mockett.com.
Page size can be reduced by 153.0 kB (15%)
1.0 MB
871.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Grommet.com main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 623.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 152.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 152.2 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 522 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Grommet images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 130 B
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 186 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Grommet.com has all CSS files already compressed.
Number of requests can be reduced by 147 (78%)
189
42
The browser has sent 189 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Grommet. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 133 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
grommet.com
78 ms
www.mockett.com
193 ms
calendar.css
40 ms
styles-m.css
44 ms
owl.carousel.css
38 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
64 ms
porto-icons-codes.css
35 ms
animation.css
63 ms
font-awesome.min.css
64 ms
bootstrap.optimized.min.css
67 ms
animate.optimized.css
71 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
70 ms
magnific-popup.css
70 ms
styles-l.css
72 ms
about.css
71 ms
font-awesome.min.css
37 ms
require.js
84 ms
mixins.js
88 ms
requirejs-config.js
89 ms
js
87 ms
klaviyo.js
34 ms
klevu.js
68 ms
klevu-recs.js
66 ms
siteseal.js
275 ms
klevu-user-customization-161720580493913431.js
322 ms
gtm.js
137 ms
core.js
199 ms
gtm.js
142 ms
2022-Mockett-Logo-Black.png
170 ms
2022-Mockett-Logo-White.png
168 ms
icon_sprite.png
166 ms
PCS36AUSB-90_1.jpg
168 ms
EDP3-23.jpg
167 ms
DP105_1.jpg
169 ms
TL-Series.jpg
228 ms
SPD2M.jpg
215 ms
FSA1-23.jpg
214 ms
SH29-100px.jpg
214 ms
CA56b-SA-62-210px.jpg
214 ms
wm27.webp
274 ms
ucs8.webp
277 ms
pcs50bu1.webp
238 ms
dp307.webp
238 ms
dp300.webp
338 ms
ne-design.webp
277 ms
ne-tradeshow.webp
257 ms
Office-BW.png
256 ms
Office.png
274 ms
Residential-BW.png
275 ms
Residential.png
314 ms
Hospitality-BW.png
315 ms
Hospitality.png
315 ms
Education-BW.png
316 ms
Education_1.png
316 ms
FB-low.gif
526 ms
INST-low.gif
345 ms
PN-low.gif
407 ms
YT-low.gif
408 ms
TW-low.gif
379 ms
IN-low.gif
408 ms
jquery.js
359 ms
common.js
377 ms
dataPost.js
376 ms
bootstrap.js
396 ms
d
279 ms
app.js
236 ms
form-key-provider.js
243 ms
mage-translation-dictionary.js
242 ms
evrecgreen.gif
71 ms
theme.js
259 ms
sw_megamenu.js
248 ms
domReady.js
258 ms
d
137 ms
d
78 ms
klevu-webstore.js
38 ms
fbevents.js
62 ms
opensans-400.woff
340 ms
opensans-300.woff
343 ms
opensans-600.woff
311 ms
opensans-700.woff
290 ms
porto-icons.woff
346 ms
underscore.js
290 ms
klevu-161720580493913431.js
23 ms
url.js
295 ms
jquery-mixin.js
294 ms
customer-data.js
279 ms
customer-data-mixin.js
278 ms
bat.js
37 ms
jquery-migrate.js
175 ms
slick.js
176 ms
template.js
156 ms
confirm.js
156 ms
widget.js
176 ms
main.js
170 ms
bootstrap.js
235 ms
text.js
163 ms
types.js
163 ms
layout.js
163 ms
smart-keyboard-handler.js
142 ms
mage.js
142 ms
ie-class-fixer.js
142 ms
jquery.lazyload.js
156 ms
jquery.stellar.min.js
153 ms
klevu-161720580493913431-maps.js
244 ms
klevu-161720580493913431-banner.js
247 ms
klevu_search_box_klevu-161720580493913431.min.css
265 ms
klevu-layout-slim.js
15 ms
klevu-loader.GIF
10 ms
main.js
68 ms
wrapper.js
28 ms
knockout.js
70 ms
section-config.js
25 ms
storage-wrapper.js
26 ms
translate.js
23 ms
modal.js
24 ms
storage.js
53 ms
storage-mixin.js
51 ms
js-translation.json
91 ms
main.js
51 ms
registry.js
52 ms
scripts.js
45 ms
version.js
42 ms
console-logger.js
41 ms
load
138 ms
js.storage.js
41 ms
modal-popup.html
279 ms
modal-slide.html
239 ms
modal-custom.html
125 ms
key-codes.js
38 ms
core.js
51 ms
z-index.js
49 ms
knockout-es5.js
33 ms
storage-sequence.js
43 ms
local.js
81 ms
engine.js
77 ms
bootstrap.js
78 ms
observable_array.js
82 ms
bound-nodes.js
83 ms
arrays.js
87 ms
compare.js
90 ms
misc.js
93 ms
objects.js
94 ms
strings.js
102 ms
template.js
98 ms
cookie-wrapper.js
105 ms
logger.js
105 ms
entry-factory.js
107 ms
console-output-handler.js
125 ms
formatter.js
113 ms
message-pool.js
115 ms
levels-pool.js
117 ms
logger-utils.js
128 ms
data.js
117 ms
disable-selection.js
119 ms
focusable.js
127 ms
form.js
137 ms
ie.js
130 ms
keycode.js
128 ms
labels.js
140 ms
jquery-patch.js
137 ms
plugin.js
141 ms
safe-active-element.js
147 ms
safe-blur.js
140 ms
scroll-parent.js
134 ms
tabbable.js
103 ms
unique-id.js
100 ms
events.js
114 ms
knockout-repeat.js
101 ms
knockout-fast-foreach.js
103 ms
observable_source.js
105 ms
renderer.js
111 ms
resizable.js
126 ms
i18n.js
108 ms
scope.js
122 ms
range.js
111 ms
mage-init.js
111 ms
keyboard.js
108 ms
optgroup.js
113 ms
after-render.js
115 ms
autoselect.js
111 ms
datepicker.js
113 ms
outer_click.js
109 ms
fadeVisible.js
119 ms
collapsible.js
112 ms
staticChecked.js
106 ms
simple-checked.js
109 ms
bind-html.js
106 ms
tooltip.js
120 ms
color-picker.js
103 ms
js.cookie.js
107 ms
entry.js
103 ms
moment.js
112 ms
class.js
69 ms
loader.js
60 ms
async.js
69 ms
spectrum.js
14 ms
tinycolor.js
36 ms
tooltip.html
35 ms
dom-observer.js
18 ms
bindings.js
12 ms
print.css
12 ms
grommet.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
grommet.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
grommet.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Grommet.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Grommet.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
grommet.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Grommet. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: