Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

halliburton.com

Halliburton

Page Load Speed

3.3 sec in total

First Response

100 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

681 ms

halliburton.com screenshot

About Website

Visit halliburton.com now to see the best up-to-date Halliburton content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about halliburton.com

Halliburton is one of the world's largest providers of products and services for the ever-evolving needs of the energy industry.

Visit halliburton.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Halliburton.com page load time and found that the first response time was 100 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

halliburton.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.5 s

34/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.4 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

85/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,570 ms

13/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.2 s

50/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

halliburton.com

100 ms

www.halliburton.com

78 ms

default.page

346 ms

halcom-home-fixed.css

45 ms

common.css

128 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (71 requests) were addressed to the original Halliburton.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to S685875175.t.eloqua.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Quotes.corporate-ir.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (713 ms) belongs to the original domain Halliburton.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 957.8 kB (30%)

Content Size

3.2 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Halliburton.com main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 62.6 kB

  • Original 79.4 kB
  • After minification 75.3 kB
  • After compression 16.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 62.6 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 164.5 kB

  • Original 2.2 MB
  • After minification 2.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Halliburton images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 389.8 kB

  • Original 484.5 kB
  • After minification 309.8 kB
  • After compression 94.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 389.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 340.9 kB

  • Original 390.1 kB
  • After minification 283.6 kB
  • After compression 49.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Halliburton.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 340.9 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 19 (26%)

Requests Now

72

After Optimization

53

The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Halliburton. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

halliburton.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

halliburton.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

halliburton.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Halliburton.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Halliburton.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Halliburton. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: