5.5 sec in total
456 ms
4.8 sec
288 ms
Visit harefieldplace.com now to see the best up-to-date Harefield Place content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about harefieldplace.com
Visit harefieldplace.comWe analyzed Harefieldplace.com page load time and found that the first response time was 456 ms and then it took 5.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
harefieldplace.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.7 s
2/100
10%
Value11.7 s
0/100
25%
Value17.1 s
0/100
10%
Value2,680 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.064
97/100
15%
Value18.9 s
3/100
10%
456 ms
259 ms
375 ms
313 ms
335 ms
Our browser made a total of 80 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Harefieldplace.com, 6% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Harefieldplace.com.
Page size can be reduced by 97.5 kB (15%)
642.7 kB
545.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Harefieldplace.com main page is 642.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 337.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 87.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 87.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Harefield Place images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Number of requests can be reduced by 52 (74%)
70
18
The browser has sent 70 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Harefield Place. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 24 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.harefieldplace.com
456 ms
fonts.css
259 ms
dashicons.min.css
375 ms
shortcodes.css
313 ms
styles.css
335 ms
style.min.css
434 ms
font-awesome.min.css
358 ms
jquery-ui.min.css
377 ms
js_composer.min.css
597 ms
bootstrap.min.css
446 ms
base.min.css
458 ms
style.min.css
468 ms
other.min.css
491 ms
style.css
525 ms
custom-skin.css
555 ms
style.css
563 ms
css2
29 ms
css2
42 ms
jquery.min.js
624 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
623 ms
cookie-list.js
635 ms
shortcode-block-cookie.js
646 ms
js
68 ms
css
12 ms
lightbox.min.css
627 ms
owl.min.css
627 ms
animate.min.css
687 ms
linea-iconfont-admin.css
688 ms
all.min.css
688 ms
rs6.css
728 ms
cookie-popup.js
727 ms
jquery.base64.min.js
775 ms
index.js
783 ms
index.js
783 ms
rbtools.min.js
890 ms
rs6.min.js
994 ms
api.js
35 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
866 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
885 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
957 ms
index.js
911 ms
gsap.min.js
815 ms
ScrollToPlugin.min.js
780 ms
ScrollMagic.min.js
762 ms
animation.gsap.min.js
757 ms
sticky-header.min.js
752 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
758 ms
lightbox.min.js
777 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
736 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
749 ms
underscore.min.js
748 ms
vc-waypoints.min.js
762 ms
vc_grid.min.js
756 ms
main.min.js
755 ms
Harefield-Place_logo_white_mobile-x2_500x248px.png
683 ms
dummy.png
683 ms
title-separator-300x9.png
684 ms
Harefield-Place_pool-gym-ickenham-house-1024x658.jpg
856 ms
harefield-show-home-int-43-HDR-ickenham-house-1024x683.jpg
792 ms
DSC01863-ickenham-house-1024x659.jpg
812 ms
block-all.svg
710 ms
essential.svg
728 ms
functionality.svg
685 ms
statistics.svg
743 ms
targeting.svg
761 ms
NGSpv5_NC0k9P_v6ZUCbLRAHxK1E1yyccQ.woff
95 ms
NGSpv5_NC0k9P_v6ZUCbLRAHxK1EiSyccQ.woff
102 ms
NGSpv5_NC0k9P_v6ZUCbLRAHxK1EuyyccQ.woff
120 ms
7r3DqXNgp8wxdOdOlyAK_a0.woff
418 ms
7r3GqXNgp8wxdOdOr48.woff
436 ms
linea.woff
755 ms
www.harefieldplace.com
772 ms
flaticon.woff
782 ms
recaptcha__en.js
40 ms
fa-solid-900.ttf
1098 ms
fa-regular-400.ttf
765 ms
prev.png
311 ms
next.png
319 ms
loading.gif
343 ms
close.png
367 ms
harefieldplace.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
harefieldplace.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
harefieldplace.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Harefieldplace.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Harefieldplace.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
harefieldplace.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Harefield Place. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: