38.3 sec in total
368 ms
31.2 sec
6.8 sec
Visit hotelstoll.com now to see the best up-to-date Hotel Stoll content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about hotelstoll.com
Visit hotelstoll.comWe analyzed Hotelstoll.com page load time and found that the first response time was 368 ms and then it took 38 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there were 2 request timeouts, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
hotelstoll.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.2 s
3/100
10%
Value29.7 s
0/100
25%
Value28.5 s
0/100
10%
Value25,170 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.317
37/100
15%
Value35.1 s
0/100
10%
368 ms
606 ms
129 ms
382 ms
685 ms
Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Hotelstoll.com, 11% (10 requests) were made to Holidaycheck.de and 3% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.2 sec) relates to the external source Tripadvisor.com.
Page size can be reduced by 134.1 kB (4%)
3.8 MB
3.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Hotelstoll.com main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 91.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 91.1 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hotel Stoll images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 8.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hotelstoll.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 8.6 kB or 11% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (52%)
81
39
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hotel Stoll. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
hotelstoll.com
368 ms
606 ms
css
129 ms
font-awesome.min.css
382 ms
jquery.js
685 ms
headroom.js
380 ms
jquery.headroom.js
379 ms
style.min.css
385 ms
styles.css
470 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
815 ms
default.min.css
818 ms
masterslider.main.css
818 ms
custom.css
826 ms
motion-ui.min.css
828 ms
foundation.css
1124 ms
style.css
1020 ms
master.css
1027 ms
jquery.min.js
1137 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1049 ms
js
130 ms
f6-topbar.js
1115 ms
widgets
710 ms
en
320 ms
index.js
1408 ms
index.js
1409 ms
wpcf7-redirect-script.js
1408 ms
cookiechoices.min.js
1435 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.js
1633 ms
what-input.min.js
1533 ms
foundation.min.js
1856 ms
scripts-en.js
1747 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
1748 ms
masterslider.min.js
1862 ms
slick.css
1855 ms
slick-theme.css
1941 ms
slick.min.js
2067 ms
wejs
20188 ms
wejs
20144 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1377 ms
fbevents.js
215 ms
gtm.js
83 ms
main.js
248 ms
CoE2017_WidgetAsset-14348-2.png
326 ms
logo_xlarge.png
199 ms
tripadvisor_logo_transp_340x80-18034-2.png
321 ms
pattern.jpg
1196 ms
logo-hotel-stoll.png
1194 ms
menu-toggle.png
1098 ms
ico-close.png
1178 ms
blank.gif
1303 ms
bestprice-en.png
1409 ms
button-en-pichlerhof.png
1525 ms
leaf.png
1498 ms
leafs-left.png
1513 ms
leafs-right.png
1513 ms
bs-en.png
1622 ms
suedtirol.png
1728 ms
gsies.png
1817 ms
selected-hotels.png
1830 ms
analytics.js
273 ms
fenix-regular-webfont.woff
1864 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
1981 ms
boutiquescript-webfont.woff
2038 ms
js
98 ms
divider.png
1853 ms
checkmark-24.png
1945 ms
184501392118219
172 ms
collect
24 ms
collect
25 ms
collect
11 ms
collect
16 ms
ga-audiences
78 ms
2336230006437260
79 ms
footer-bg.jpg
1918 ms
divider-long.png
1859 ms
Hotel_Stoll_HighRes-3681-570x340.jpg
5580 ms
Hotel_Stoll_HighRes-2791-1-570x340.jpg
5594 ms
Hotel_Stoll_HighRes-2221-570x340.jpg
5581 ms
978351-570x340.jpeg
5572 ms
5132-570x340.jpeg
5578 ms
loading-2.gif
5053 ms
light-skin-1.png
4233 ms
Hotel_Stoll_HighRes-3781-scaled-1920x1080.jpg
5635 ms
font-opensans.css
3316 ms
widgets.min.css
3304 ms
widgets
3526 ms
ajax-loader.gif
1793 ms
logo_small.png
573 ms
global_spinner.gif
552 ms
open-sans-v15-latin-300.woff
402 ms
open-sans-v15-latin-regular.woff
398 ms
open-sans-v15-latin-600.woff
399 ms
open-sans-v15-latin-700.woff
268 ms
hotelstoll.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
hotelstoll.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
hotelstoll.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hotelstoll.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hotelstoll.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hotelstoll.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hotel Stoll. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: