Tools & Wizards About Us
http-www.us screenshot

Report Summary

  • 80

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

http-www.us

Loading...

Page Load Speed

959 ms in total

First Response

233 ms

Resources Loaded

581 ms

Page Rendered

145 ms

http-www.us screenshot

About Website

Visit http-www.us now to see the best up-to-date Http Www content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about http-www.us

Visit http-www.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Http-www.us page load time and found that the first response time was 233 ms and then it took 726 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

http-www.us performance score

80

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

56/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value150 ms

95/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.032

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.9 s

89/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

http-www.us

233 ms

visitor.css

15 ms

visitor.js

23 ms

name.jpg

105 ms

l1.jpg

110 ms

Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (36 requests) were addressed to the original Http-www.us, 3% (1 request) were made to Assets1.chat.freshdesk.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Assets.chat.freshdesk.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (341 ms) belongs to the original domain Http-www.us.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 36.3 kB (16%)

Content Size

234.0 kB

After Optimization

197.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Http-www.us main page is 234.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 135.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 14.3 kB

  • Original 19.3 kB
  • After minification 19.2 kB
  • After compression 5.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.3 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 5.9 kB

  • Original 59.7 kB
  • After minification 53.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Http Www images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 2 B

  • Original 135.5 kB
  • After minification 135.5 kB
  • After compression 135.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 16.2 kB

  • Original 19.5 kB
  • After minification 19.1 kB
  • After compression 3.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Http-www.us needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 16.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (54%)

Requests Now

39

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 39 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Http Www. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

http-www.us

http-www.us

233 ms

visitor.css

visitor.css

15 ms

visitor.js

visitor.js

23 ms

name.jpg

name.jpg

105 ms

l1.jpg

l1.jpg

110 ms

l3.jpg

l3.jpg

104 ms

home.jpg

home.jpg

106 ms

q6.jpg

q6.jpg

106 ms

about.jpg

about.jpg

106 ms

host.jpg

host.jpg

118 ms

sup.jpg

sup.jpg

123 ms

cont.jpg

cont.jpg

136 ms

a1.jpg

a1.jpg

140 ms

a2.jpg

a2.jpg

143 ms

txt1.jpg

txt1.jpg

153 ms

a3.jpg

a3.jpg

159 ms

q1.gif

q1.gif

170 ms

line1.jpg

line1.jpg

173 ms

a4.jpg

a4.jpg

178 ms

a5.jpg

a5.jpg

187 ms

q4.gif

q4.gif

195 ms

a6.jpg

a6.jpg

218 ms

a7.jpg

a7.jpg

218 ms

a8.jpg

a8.jpg

222 ms

a9.jpg

a9.jpg

218 ms

a10.jpg

a10.jpg

232 ms

a11.jpg

a11.jpg

233 ms

a12.jpg

a12.jpg

300 ms

a13.jpg

a13.jpg

275 ms

a14.jpg

a14.jpg

271 ms

q5.gif

q5.gif

261 ms

a15.jpg

a15.jpg

289 ms

a17.jpg

a17.jpg

291 ms

q2.gif

q2.gif

296 ms

a19.jpg

a19.jpg

338 ms

q3.gif

q3.gif

336 ms

a20.jpg

a20.jpg

334 ms

line2.jpg

line2.jpg

341 ms

0

0

42 ms

teamstatus

teamstatus

76 ms

Accessibility Review

http-www.us accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best Practices

http-www.us best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

http-www.us SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Http-www.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Http-www.us main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

http-www.us

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Http Www. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: