6.2 sec in total
860 ms
4.8 sec
567 ms
Visit humaneyes.com now to see the best up-to-date Humaneyes content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about humaneyes.com
Humaneyes Technologies is a leading global provider of virtual reality solutions; we leverage a portfolio of VR related patents and technology to develop the worldwide adoption of Cameras, Software, a...
Visit humaneyes.comWe analyzed Humaneyes.com page load time and found that the first response time was 860 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
humaneyes.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value28.8 s
0/100
25%
Value11.8 s
4/100
10%
Value1,380 ms
16/100
30%
Value0.058
98/100
15%
Value24.0 s
1/100
10%
860 ms
788 ms
940 ms
780 ms
801 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Humaneyes.com, 80% (48 requests) were made to Cdn.humaneyes.com and 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source Cdn.humaneyes.com.
Page size can be reduced by 519.3 kB (38%)
1.4 MB
838.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Humaneyes.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 682.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.1 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Humaneyes images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 251.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 251.6 kB or 69% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 225.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Humaneyes.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 225.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (63%)
54
20
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Humaneyes. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.humaneyes.com
860 ms
styles.css
788 ms
bootstrap.min.css
940 ms
font-awesome.min.css
780 ms
flexslider.css
801 ms
jquery.sidr.css
785 ms
superfish-navbar.css
797 ms
supersized.css
922 ms
supersized.shutter.css
933 ms
style.css
1242 ms
vesa.responsive.css
948 ms
css
26 ms
jquery.js
1101 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
1066 ms
modernizr-2.6.2-respond-1.1.0.min.js
1083 ms
comment-reply.min.js
1221 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1235 ms
scripts.js
1213 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1377 ms
superfish.min.js
1339 ms
jquery.flexslider.min.js
1374 ms
jquery.sidr.min.js
1375 ms
jquery.sticky.js
1391 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
1403 ms
jquery.nav.js
1404 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
1512 ms
jquery.infinitescroll.min.js
1518 ms
mcscrollbar.js
1520 ms
froogaloop2.min.js
20 ms
player_api
30 ms
videobg.js
1528 ms
script-inits.js
1665 ms
js
22 ms
main.js
1542 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1658 ms
loading.gif
444 ms
human-hp-WHITE7_01.jpg
948 ms
BTN.png
444 ms
logo.png
548 ms
scroll_03_03.png
518 ms
home_line.png
521 ms
human-hp-WHITE7_02.jpg
965 ms
human-hp-WHITE7_04.jpg
1128 ms
human-hp-WHITE7_05.jpg
1402 ms
nespresso.gif
1584 ms
wedding.gif
1891 ms
x.png
1093 ms
benny2-177x235.png
1398 ms
mimi-177x235.png
1382 ms
Alon_Dumanis.jpg
1278 ms
logo.png
1573 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
5 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
34 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
12 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
10 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
33 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
10 ms
www-widgetapi.js
16 ms
arrleft.png
1109 ms
arrright.png
1112 ms
humaneyes.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
button, link, and menuitem elements do not have accessible names.
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
humaneyes.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
humaneyes.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Humaneyes.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Humaneyes.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
humaneyes.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Humaneyes. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: