Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 37% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    95% of websites

hurtclaim.com

LawDomains.ca | Premium Law Domains for Lawyers and Professionals in the Legal Industry

Page Load Speed

5.1 sec in total

First Response

119 ms

Resources Loaded

3.5 sec

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

hurtclaim.com screenshot

About Website

Visit hurtclaim.com now to see the best up-to-date Hurtclaim content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about hurtclaim.com

A Premium Law Domain can help increase traffic to your website by attracting visitors who are searching for your keywords. Studies have revealed that relevant domain names containing the keywords sear...

Visit hurtclaim.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Hurtclaim.com page load time and found that the first response time was 119 ms and then it took 4.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hurtclaim.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

40/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value51.8 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value73,990 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.049

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value95.1 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

hurtclaim.com

119 ms

lease_1.html

163 ms

js

132 ms

css

334 ms

bootstrap.min.css

45 ms

Our browser made a total of 38 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Hurtclaim.com, 76% (29 requests) were made to Lawdomains.ca and 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) relates to the external source Whc.ca.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 604.9 kB (35%)

Content Size

1.7 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

In fact, the total size of Hurtclaim.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-96%

Potential reduce by 377.7 kB

  • Original 395.4 kB
  • After minification 296.4 kB
  • After compression 17.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 99.0 kB, which is 25% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 377.7 kB or 96% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 222.0 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Hurtclaim needs image optimization as it can save up to 222.0 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 68.9 kB
  • After minification 68.9 kB
  • After compression 67.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 42.1 kB
  • After minification 42.1 kB
  • After compression 38.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hurtclaim.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (29%)

Requests Now

34

After Optimization

24

The browser has sent 34 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hurtclaim. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

hurtclaim.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

hurtclaim.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

hurtclaim.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hurtclaim.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Hurtclaim.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hurtclaim. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: