563 ms in total
68 ms
347 ms
148 ms
Click here to check amazing Hydroscreen content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about hydroscreen.com
We engineer coanda screen and wedgewire screen solutions to solve your liquid-solids separation and water screening challenges. We can help your project succeed.
Visit hydroscreen.comWe analyzed Hydroscreen.com page load time and found that the first response time was 68 ms and then it took 495 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.
hydroscreen.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.0 s
49/100
10%
Value7.0 s
6/100
25%
Value3.2 s
92/100
10%
Value330 ms
75/100
30%
Value0.016
100/100
15%
Value6.8 s
55/100
10%
68 ms
52 ms
50 ms
51 ms
50 ms
Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Hydroscreen.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to W.sharethis.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to S.sharethis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (154 ms) belongs to the original domain Hydroscreen.com.
Page size can be reduced by 149.8 kB (18%)
840.5 kB
690.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Hydroscreen.com main page is 840.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 604.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 17.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.1 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 17.1 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 228 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Hydroscreen images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 117.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 117.0 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 15.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hydroscreen.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 15.5 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (52%)
29
14
The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Hydroscreen. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
hydroscreen.com
68 ms
reset.css
52 ms
style.css
50 ms
grid.css
51 ms
superfish.css
50 ms
tm-slider.css
51 ms
jquery-1.4.2.min.js
98 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
69 ms
tms.js
68 ms
tms_presets.js
108 ms
superfish.js
69 ms
cufon-yui.js
71 ms
cufon-replace.js
87 ms
Bebas_400.font.js
104 ms
buttons.js
20 ms
loader.js
16 ms
js
126 ms
loader.js
25 ms
buttons.js
24 ms
counter.js
33 ms
bg_hydroscreen_white.jpg
73 ms
bg-1_hydroscreen.png
72 ms
pic-1_white.gif
122 ms
hydroscreen_engineers-water-screening-solutions.jpg
73 ms
bg-submenu.gif
72 ms
hydroscreen-large-hydro-screens.jpg
139 ms
hydroscreen-stormwater-outfall-screens.jpg
122 ms
hydroscreen-municipal-screens.jpg
141 ms
hydroscreen-micro-hydro-screens.jpg
130 ms
hydroscreen-agriculture-screens.jpg
129 ms
bg-box-1.jpg
130 ms
bg-box.jpg
130 ms
bg-box-2.jpg
154 ms
bull-h_hydroscreen.png
78 ms
bull_hydroscreen.png
86 ms
hydroscreen.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
hydroscreen.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
hydroscreen.com SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hydroscreen.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Hydroscreen.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
hydroscreen.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hydroscreen. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: