4.8 sec in total
300 ms
4.1 sec
454 ms
Visit icinga.org now to see the best up-to-date Icinga content for Czech Republic and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about icinga.org
Tackle the monitoring challenge » Get a complete overview of all your systems and applications. Flexible, scalable and automated monitoring.
Visit icinga.orgWe analyzed Icinga.org page load time and found that the first response time was 300 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
icinga.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.6 s
62/100
10%
Value2.8 s
83/100
25%
Value5.7 s
51/100
10%
Value1,090 ms
24/100
30%
Value0.178
68/100
15%
Value6.9 s
53/100
10%
300 ms
1036 ms
100 ms
196 ms
55 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Icinga.org, 16% (12 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Icinga.org.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (20%)
6.5 MB
5.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Icinga.org main page is 6.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 64.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 64.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 332.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Icinga images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 321.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 321.8 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 568.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Icinga.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 568.2 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (56%)
62
27
The browser has sent 62 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Icinga. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
icinga.org
300 ms
www.icinga.org
1036 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
100 ms
styles.css
196 ms
css
55 ms
style.css
299 ms
tp_twitter_plugin.css
297 ms
woocommerce-layout.css
307 ms
woocommerce.css
309 ms
css
67 ms
style.css
547 ms
app.css
324 ms
tablepress-combined.min.css
392 ms
shortcodes.css
394 ms
shortcodes_responsive.css
391 ms
magnific_popup.css
397 ms
jquery.js
650 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
488 ms
frontend-builder-global-functions.js
487 ms
jquery.form.min.js
487 ms
scripts.js
491 ms
idle-timer.min.js
580 ms
custom.js
583 ms
add-to-cart.min.js
585 ms
jquery.blockUI.min.js
587 ms
woocommerce.min.js
755 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
755 ms
cart-fragments.min.js
755 ms
comment-reply.min.js
755 ms
jquery.mobile.custom.min.js
755 ms
custom.js
765 ms
smoothscroll.js
771 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
772 ms
waypoints.min.js
773 ms
jquery.magnific-popup.js
773 ms
frontend-builder-scripts.js
919 ms
wp-embed.min.js
883 ms
ga.js
109 ms
icinga_logo.png
190 ms
berlin_camp.jpg
1598 ms
logo_icinga_white-300x1161.png
189 ms
subscribe-loader.gif
188 ms
partner_logo_netways1.png
462 ms
logo_partner_olindata.png
461 ms
logo_partner_shadowsoft.png
461 ms
partner_logo_az.png
462 ms
puppetlabs.png
462 ms
cern_logo.png
462 ms
mueller_logo.png
463 ms
audi_logo1.png
497 ms
logo_snapdeal.png
464 ms
ec_logo.png
463 ms
logo_spacex.png
561 ms
gruner_jahr_logo.png
464 ms
logo_mcgill1.png
576 ms
logo_debian.png
498 ms
logo_adobe.png
562 ms
logo_ripe.png
603 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
64 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
78 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTdqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
101 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNStqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
133 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
135 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
134 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-htqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
135 ms
ETmodules_v2_4.ttf
767 ms
xjAJXh38I15wypJXxuGMBl02b4v3fUxqf9CZJ1qUoIA.ttf
133 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxvqEJM-AK1nFUafhVdytxUY.ttf
129 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxmYImPRL1w80NlYTQ8LOqf4.ttf
164 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxiBnJMIPt0VoltfALX9gDFQ.ttf
390 ms
PRmiXeptR36kaC0GEAetxk7Gbs5Oj9RrfpUUQRHsz5w.ttf
391 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
www.icinga.org
478 ms
canyon.jpg
1373 ms
core.jpg
1474 ms
community.jpg
1149 ms
woocommerce-smallscreen.css
98 ms
icinga.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
icinga.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
icinga.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Icinga.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Icinga.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
icinga.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Icinga. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: