2.3 sec in total
242 ms
1.8 sec
235 ms
Visit ideastudio.com now to see the best up-to-date Idea Studio content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ideastudio.com
When you need a logo design in Tulsa, hire the firm that focuses on designing logos. We always stay in budget and deliver on time.
Visit ideastudio.comWe analyzed Ideastudio.com page load time and found that the first response time was 242 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
ideastudio.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
20/100
10%
Value10.9 s
0/100
25%
Value54.9 s
0/100
10%
Value86,700 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.057
98/100
15%
Value112.8 s
0/100
10%
242 ms
28 ms
128 ms
159 ms
149 ms
Our browser made a total of 64 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 84% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Ideastudio.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) belongs to the original domain Ideastudio.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 MB (23%)
6.0 MB
4.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Ideastudio.com main page is 6.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 4.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 74.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.4 kB or 80% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 263.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Idea Studio images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 576.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 576.9 kB or 72% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 464.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ideastudio.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 464.5 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (65%)
60
21
The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Idea Studio. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 20 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ideastudio.com
242 ms
analytics.js
28 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
128 ms
google-review.css
159 ms
styles.css
149 ms
settings.css
155 ms
style.css
149 ms
base.css
151 ms
buttons.css
203 ms
mfn-icons.css
234 ms
grid.css
223 ms
layout.css
322 ms
shortcodes.css
311 ms
variables.css
237 ms
style-simple.css
286 ms
animations.min.css
306 ms
jquery.ui.all.css
318 ms
prettyPhoto.css
319 ms
jplayer.blue.monday.css
363 ms
responsive.css
388 ms
css
17 ms
css
28 ms
custom.css
386 ms
wpac-time.js
397 ms
jquery.js
471 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
398 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
516 ms
jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js
535 ms
collect
10 ms
scripts.js
419 ms
core.min.js
420 ms
widget.min.js
443 ms
mouse.min.js
532 ms
sortable.min.js
533 ms
tabs.min.js
533 ms
accordion.min.js
532 ms
plugins.js
782 ms
menu.js
567 ms
animations.min.js
572 ms
jplayer.min.js
671 ms
scripts.js
605 ms
wp-embed.min.js
523 ms
rplg.js
550 ms
generic_business-71.png
65 ms
photo.jpg
127 ms
photo.jpg
174 ms
photo.jpg
248 ms
Geometric2.jpg
623 ms
IBM_400.png
399 ms
2017-Slideshow1.jpg
623 ms
2017-Slideshow2.jpg
876 ms
2017-Slideshow3.jpg
975 ms
2017-Slideshow4.jpg
1014 ms
2017-Slideshow5.jpg
912 ms
2017-Slideshow6.jpg
988 ms
2017-Slideshow7.jpg
919 ms
powered_by_google_on_white.png
950 ms
box_shadow.png
959 ms
UyYrYy3ltEffJV9QueSi4VLE0juxe_YrR4_5kH0wfhI.ttf
21 ms
mfn-icons.woff
965 ms
jObgDQiPUtmACAaaK3pMGyZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
10 ms
tp-leftarrow.png
662 ms
tp-rightarrow.png
689 ms
top_bar_right_shadow.png
698 ms
ideastudio.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ideastudio.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
ideastudio.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ideastudio.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ideastudio.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ideastudio.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Idea Studio. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: