4.4 sec in total
284 ms
3.6 sec
460 ms
Welcome to imagestream.com homepage info - get ready to check Image Stream best content for Mexico right away, or after learning these important things about imagestream.com
Network Administration, Telecommunications, Software Development, Engineering field and Support, Administración de redes, Telecomunicaciones, Desarrollo de software, Ingenieria de campo, y soporte téc...
Visit imagestream.comWe analyzed Imagestream.com page load time and found that the first response time was 284 ms and then it took 4.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
imagestream.com performance score
284 ms
1043 ms
185 ms
253 ms
545 ms
Our browser made a total of 45 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 87% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Imagestream.com, 9% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Maps.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Imagestream.com.
Page size can be reduced by 541.0 kB (26%)
2.1 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Imagestream.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 22.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.4 kB, which is 33% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.1 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 135.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Image Stream images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 151.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 151.0 kB or 53% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 232.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Imagestream.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 232.6 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (45%)
40
22
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Image Stream. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
imagestream.com
284 ms
bootstrap.min.css
1043 ms
font-awesome.min.css
185 ms
font-awesome.css
253 ms
animate.min.css
545 ms
owl.carousel.css
125 ms
owl.transitions.css
173 ms
prettyPhoto.css
385 ms
main.css
477 ms
logo.png
439 ms
CloudSolutions.jpg
1104 ms
BlueCare.jpg
952 ms
BSCN.jpg
617 ms
SISPRO.jpg
1102 ms
jquery.js
988 ms
bootstrap.min.js
1118 ms
js
99 ms
owl.carousel.min.js
1157 ms
mousescroll.js
1503 ms
smoothscroll.js
1100 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
1216 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
1237 ms
jquery.inview.min.js
1211 ms
wow.min.js
1238 ms
main.js
1307 ms
noc.jpg
1426 ms
soc.jpg
2339 ms
voc.jpg
1639 ms
data-center.jpg
1641 ms
arcom.png
1640 ms
BT_Brasil.png
1644 ms
sispro.png
1659 ms
usa.jpg
2080 ms
mexico.jpg
1772 ms
css
72 ms
QHD8zigcbDB8aPfIoaupKOvvDin1pK8aKteLpeZ5c0A.ttf
51 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfSZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
50 ms
Jzo62I39jc0gQRrbndN6nXYhjbSpvc47ee6xR_80Hnw.ttf
52 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOCZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf
50 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
925 ms
bg1.jpg
868 ms
bg2.jpg
1491 ms
bg3.jpg
541 ms
bg6.jpg
1263 ms
bg8.jpg
1241 ms
imagestream.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Imagestream.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Imagestream.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
imagestream.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Image Stream. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: