6.4 sec in total
29 ms
5.1 sec
1.3 sec
Click here to check amazing Interface Gypt content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about interfacegypt.com
We are a Full-Service Branding and Social Media agency based in Egypt with a strong desire to help every single business to achieve its goals.
Visit interfacegypt.comWe analyzed Interfacegypt.com page load time and found that the first response time was 29 ms and then it took 6.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
interfacegypt.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.4 s
0/100
10%
Value16.2 s
0/100
25%
Value19.8 s
0/100
10%
Value2,380 ms
5/100
30%
Value0.057
98/100
15%
Value26.0 s
0/100
10%
29 ms
3210 ms
86 ms
61 ms
59 ms
Our browser made a total of 92 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 35% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Interfacegypt.com, 41% (38 requests) were made to I0.wp.com and 12% (11 requests) were made to C0.wp.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Interfacegypt.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (44%)
4.1 MB
2.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Interfacegypt.com main page is 4.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 145.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 145.5 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Interface Gypt images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 581.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 581.2 kB or 53% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Interfacegypt.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 87% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 42 (48%)
87
45
The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interface Gypt. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
interfacegypt.com
29 ms
interfacegypt.com
3210 ms
js
86 ms
style.min.css
61 ms
mediaelementplayer-legacy.min.css
59 ms
wp-mediaelement.min.css
69 ms
styles.css
70 ms
style.css
114 ms
fontawesome.min.css
89 ms
js_composer.min.css
180 ms
frontend-gtag.min.js
87 ms
jquery.min.js
49 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
49 ms
js
177 ms
integration-plugin.js
178 ms
js
388 ms
js
387 ms
fbevents.js
560 ms
interface-logo.png
266 ms
interface-logo-reverse.png
264 ms
interface-logo-mobile.png
264 ms
interface-logo-reverse-mobile.png
264 ms
discover-1-jpg.webp
650 ms
css
443 ms
bootstrap.min.css
230 ms
style.css
122 ms
rs6.css
390 ms
image-cdn.js
394 ms
index.js
393 ms
index.js
393 ms
rbtools.min.js
515 ms
rs6.min.js
440 ms
api.js
518 ms
wp-polyfill-inert.min.js
112 ms
regenerator-runtime.min.js
112 ms
wp-polyfill.min.js
111 ms
index.js
515 ms
e-202410.js
402 ms
js_composer_front.min.js
513 ms
skrollr.min.js
514 ms
akismet-frontend.js
515 ms
imagesloaded.min.js
109 ms
masonry.min.js
109 ms
jquery.masonry.min.js
225 ms
jquery.clb-slider.min.js
515 ms
jquery.mega-menu.min.js
515 ms
jquery.tilt.min.js
515 ms
aos.min.js
515 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
516 ms
main.min.js
587 ms
oh__img92s-1-jpg.webp
501 ms
SM-1-jpg.webp
493 ms
DM-1-jpg.webp
495 ms
Branding-1-jpg.webp
382 ms
Web-1-jpg.webp
382 ms
MB-1-jpg.webp
570 ms
CC-1-jpg.webp
570 ms
MP-jpg.webp
572 ms
GD-1-jpg.webp
572 ms
Mimary-1-1.png
575 ms
UCC-Logo.png
572 ms
Cube-Logo-1.png
577 ms
TecHub-Logo.png
575 ms
Scala-Logo.png
576 ms
ParkPlaza-Logo.png
582 ms
Hepta-Logo.png
571 ms
SYM-Logo.png
582 ms
Splash-Logo.png
583 ms
FreshHub-Logo.png
694 ms
Khan-Logo.png
693 ms
Nrva-Logo.png
695 ms
Quotem-Logo.png
1557 ms
NC-Logo-1.png
1558 ms
Flormar-Logo.png
1556 ms
Forni-Logo.png
1557 ms
Paprika-Logo.png
1557 ms
Lahab-Logo.png
1555 ms
DIS-Logo-1.png
1564 ms
DLS-Logo-1.png
1562 ms
AlJawhara-Logo-2.png
1564 ms
Agust-Logo-1.png
1559 ms
ISFP-Logo.png
1559 ms
ActionZone-Logo-1.png
1563 ms
cover-1-jpg.webp
1564 ms
park-plaza3-jpg.webp
1559 ms
lahab-jpg.webp
1565 ms
techub3-1-jpg.webp
1191 ms
rP2tp2ywxg089UriI5-g4vlH9VoD8CmcqZG40F9JadbnoEwARZtRSW3z.ttf
987 ms
bootstrap.woff
989 ms
linea-software-10.woff
117 ms
recaptcha__en.js
979 ms
Got-a-project-2-jpg.webp
248 ms
interfacegypt.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
interfacegypt.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
interfacegypt.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interfacegypt.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Interfacegypt.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
interfacegypt.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Interface Gypt. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: