Tools & Wizards About Us
intergate.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 97

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    95% of other websites

  • 78

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 46% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

intergate.com

End User Services

Page Load Speed

547 ms in total

First Response

105 ms

Resources Loaded

246 ms

Page Rendered

196 ms

intergate.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to intergate.com homepage info - get ready to check Intergate best content right away, or after learning these important things about intergate.com

End User Services is a dial-up internet service provider with nationwide access in over 8,000 cities. With reliable and affordable connections, EUS is the clear choice for dial-up service so look no f...

Visit intergate.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Intergate.com page load time and found that the first response time was 105 ms and then it took 442 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

intergate.com performance score

97

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.0 s

84/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

96/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.04

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

intergate.com

105 ms

background.gif

34 ms

spacer.gif

32 ms

igatedsl.gif

39 ms

index_01.gif

34 ms

Our browser made a total of 55 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Intergate.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (109 ms) belongs to the original domain Intergate.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 22.7 kB (64%)

Content Size

35.2 kB

After Optimization

12.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Intergate.com main page is 35.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 18.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 13.1 kB

  • Original 16.2 kB
  • After minification 15.6 kB
  • After compression 3.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.1 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-51%

Potential reduce by 9.6 kB

  • Original 18.9 kB
  • After minification 9.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Intergate needs image optimization as it can save up to 9.6 kB or 51% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (57%)

Requests Now

54

After Optimization

23

  • Images

The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Intergate. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

intergate.com

intergate.com

105 ms

background.gif

background.gif

34 ms

spacer.gif

spacer.gif

32 ms

igatedsl.gif

igatedsl.gif

39 ms

index_01.gif

index_01.gif

34 ms

index_02.gif

index_02.gif

37 ms

index_03.gif

index_03.gif

35 ms

index_04.gif

index_04.gif

34 ms

index_05.gif

index_05.gif

35 ms

revised_27.gif

revised_27.gif

46 ms

StandardSignup.gif

StandardSignup.gif

58 ms

AnnualSignup.gif

AnnualSignup.gif

58 ms

revised_06.gif

revised_06.gif

38 ms

revised_07.gif

revised_07.gif

60 ms

revised_24.gif

revised_24.gif

31 ms

revised_11.gif

revised_11.gif

32 ms

revised_12.gif

revised_12.gif

53 ms

revised_14.gif

revised_14.gif

39 ms

revised_33.gif

revised_33.gif

43 ms

revised_19.gif

revised_19.gif

48 ms

revised_20.gif

revised_20.gif

49 ms

revised_21.gif

revised_21.gif

49 ms

revised_22.gif

revised_22.gif

62 ms

revised_23.gif

revised_23.gif

51 ms

revised_36.gif

revised_36.gif

58 ms

revised_25.gif

revised_25.gif

56 ms

revised_26.gif

revised_26.gif

57 ms

revised_42.gif

revised_42.gif

71 ms

revised_28.gif

revised_28.gif

58 ms

HiSpeed01.gif

HiSpeed01.gif

65 ms

HiSpeed02.gif

HiSpeed02.gif

66 ms

revised_31.gif

revised_31.gif

65 ms

revised_32.gif

revised_32.gif

67 ms

revised_45.gif

revised_45.gif

81 ms

revised_34.gif

revised_34.gif

73 ms

revised_35.gif

revised_35.gif

73 ms

revised_48.gif

revised_48.gif

71 ms

revised_37.gif

revised_37.gif

71 ms

revised_38.gif

revised_38.gif

109 ms

revised_39.png

revised_39.png

77 ms

revised_40.gif

revised_40.gif

76 ms

revised_41.gif

revised_41.gif

77 ms

revised_43.gif

revised_43.gif

79 ms

revised_44.gif

revised_44.gif

97 ms

revised_46.gif

revised_46.gif

83 ms

revised_47.gif

revised_47.gif

80 ms

revised_49.gif

revised_49.gif

75 ms

revised_50.gif

revised_50.gif

75 ms

revised_51.gif

revised_51.gif

79 ms

revised_52.gif

revised_52.gif

72 ms

revised_53.gif

revised_53.gif

74 ms

revised_54.gif

revised_54.gif

75 ms

revised_55.gif

revised_55.gif

79 ms

revised_56.gif

revised_56.gif

79 ms

revised_57.gif

revised_57.gif

84 ms

Accessibility Review

intergate.com accessibility score

78

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

intergate.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

intergate.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1252

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intergate.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Intergate.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

intergate.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Intergate. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: