3.3 sec in total
346 ms
2.7 sec
254 ms
Visit internettarifvergleich.net now to see the best up-to-date Internet Tarifvergleich content for Germany and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about internettarifvergleich.net
Internet Tarifvergleich für DSL, Kabel Internet und mobile Flatrate Verträge. DSL & Festnetz-Telefon Angebote, Tarife und Anbieter im Vergleich.
Visit internettarifvergleich.netWe analyzed Internettarifvergleich.net page load time and found that the first response time was 346 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
internettarifvergleich.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.3 s
39/100
10%
Value3.3 s
69/100
25%
Value5.3 s
57/100
10%
Value730 ms
40/100
30%
Value0.154
74/100
15%
Value8.4 s
39/100
10%
346 ms
1346 ms
321 ms
209 ms
211 ms
Our browser made a total of 52 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (41 requests) were addressed to the original Internettarifvergleich.net, 8% (4 requests) were made to Tariffuxx.de and 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Internettarifvergleich.net.
Page size can be reduced by 204.3 kB (59%)
346.7 kB
142.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Internettarifvergleich.net main page is 346.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 201.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.8 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 3.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Internet Tarifvergleich images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 116.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 116.3 kB or 58% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 55.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Internettarifvergleich.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 55.4 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (67%)
49
16
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Internet Tarifvergleich. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
internettarifvergleich.net
346 ms
www.internettarifvergleich.net
1346 ms
mootools.js
321 ms
caption.js
209 ms
system.css
211 ms
general.css
212 ms
template.css
214 ms
typo.css
214 ms
ja.script.js
313 ms
ja.moomenu.css
314 ms
ja.moomenu.js
315 ms
default.css
317 ms
adtrust-min.php
413 ms
txfestnetz.php
621 ms
bg.gif
112 ms
mainwrap-bg.png
110 ms
pat2-1.gif
109 ms
pat2-2.gif
107 ms
logo-bg.png
209 ms
logo.gif
108 ms
shadow.gif
210 ms
pat1.gif
211 ms
grad1.gif
211 ms
mainnav-sep.gif
213 ms
trans2.png
212 ms
main-bg.gif
328 ms
downstream_tipp.gif
329 ms
doppelpfeil.png
328 ms
download-bg.gif
413 ms
internet-tarifvergleich.jpg
384 ms
inklusive.png
402 ms
hotline.png
428 ms
onepixel.gif
219 ms
txfestnetzstyle.min.css
249 ms
analytics.js
7 ms
uid-89.css
235 ms
jquery.min.js
29 ms
collect
23 ms
or.jpg
114 ms
ol.jpg
114 ms
ul.jpg
182 ms
ur.jpg
202 ms
vline.gif
209 ms
grad4.gif
235 ms
h3r-bg.gif
236 ms
symbol.gif
236 ms
dot.gif
286 ms
arrow.png
305 ms
grad3.gif
315 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
6 ms
txfestnetzscript.min.js
275 ms
glyphicons-regular.woff
13 ms
internettarifvergleich.net accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
internettarifvergleich.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
internettarifvergleich.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
DE
DE
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Internettarifvergleich.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that German is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Internettarifvergleich.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
internettarifvergleich.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Internet Tarifvergleich. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: