Tools & Wizards About Us
interviewjoy.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 87

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 62

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    56% of websites

interviewjoy.com

Interviewjoy | Get better career support

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

153 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

1.5 sec

interviewjoy.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to interviewjoy.com homepage info - get ready to check Interviewjoy best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about interviewjoy.com

Founded and run by Ex-Googlers and ex-Amazonians, interviewjoy helped thousands of people to build their careers since 2016.

Visit interviewjoy.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Interviewjoy.com page load time and found that the first response time was 153 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

interviewjoy.com performance score

87

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

66/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

62/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.5 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

interviewjoy.com

153 ms

interviewjoy.com

706 ms

css

37 ms

jquery.form.min.js

262 ms

core.min.js

276 ms

Our browser made a total of 78 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 76% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Interviewjoy.com, 23% (18 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (801 ms) belongs to the original domain Interviewjoy.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 656.8 kB (36%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Interviewjoy.com main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 957.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 616.7 kB

  • Original 728.3 kB
  • After minification 723.4 kB
  • After compression 111.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 616.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 38.4 kB

  • Original 957.3 kB
  • After minification 918.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Interviewjoy images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 122.4 kB
  • After minification 122.3 kB
  • After compression 120.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (63%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

21

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interviewjoy. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

interviewjoy.com

interviewjoy.com

153 ms

interviewjoy.com

interviewjoy.com

706 ms

css

css

37 ms

jquery.form.min.js

jquery.form.min.js

262 ms

core.min.js

core.min.js

276 ms

mouse.min.js

mouse.min.js

448 ms

jquery.ui.touch-punch.js

jquery.ui.touch-punch.js

277 ms

menu.min.js

menu.min.js

276 ms

regenerator-runtime.min.js

regenerator-runtime.min.js

437 ms

wp-polyfill.min.js

wp-polyfill.min.js

437 ms

dom-ready.min.js

dom-ready.min.js

298 ms

hooks.min.js

hooks.min.js

297 ms

i18n.min.js

i18n.min.js

296 ms

a11y.min.js

a11y.min.js

383 ms

autocomplete.min.js

autocomplete.min.js

444 ms

slider.min.js

slider.min.js

307 ms

sortable.min.js

sortable.min.js

445 ms

effect.min.js

effect.min.js

442 ms

effect-blind.min.js

effect-blind.min.js

654 ms

effect-bounce.min.js

effect-bounce.min.js

654 ms

effect-clip.min.js

effect-clip.min.js

634 ms

effect-drop.min.js

effect-drop.min.js

657 ms

effect-explode.min.js

effect-explode.min.js

601 ms

effect-fade.min.js

effect-fade.min.js

602 ms

effect-fold.min.js

effect-fold.min.js

642 ms

effect-highlight.min.js

effect-highlight.min.js

642 ms

effect-size.min.js

effect-size.min.js

647 ms

effect-scale.min.js

effect-scale.min.js

646 ms

effect-puff.min.js

effect-puff.min.js

648 ms

effect-pulsate.min.js

effect-pulsate.min.js

651 ms

effect-shake.min.js

effect-shake.min.js

653 ms

effect-slide.min.js

effect-slide.min.js

651 ms

effect-transfer.min.js

effect-transfer.min.js

670 ms

semantic.min.js

semantic.min.js

801 ms

wpjobster-front.min.js

wpjobster-front.min.js

654 ms

script.js

script.js

652 ms

slick.min.js

slick.min.js

800 ms

kb-slider-init.js

kb-slider-init.js

796 ms

splide.min.js

splide.min.js

598 ms

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf

pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrFJA.ttf

96 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9V1s.ttf

237 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8V1s.ttf

383 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_V1s.ttf

396 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTedw.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTedw.ttf

393 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6V1s.ttf

384 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7V1s.ttf

392 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4V1s.ttf

384 ms

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5V1s.ttf

pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5V1s.ttf

385 ms

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLedw.ttf

pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLedw.ttf

426 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmg1hlEA.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmg1hlEA.ttf

423 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm21llEA.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm21llEA.ttf

423 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmv1plEA.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmv1plEA.ttf

429 ms

pxiAyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmE3tF.ttf

pxiAyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmE3tF.ttf

435 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmr19lEA.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmr19lEA.ttf

434 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmy15lEA.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLmy15lEA.ttf

428 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm111lEA.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm111lEA.ttf

429 ms

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm81xlEA.ttf

pxiDyp8kv8JHgFVrJJLm81xlEA.ttf

435 ms

kb-splide-init.min.js

kb-splide-init.min.js

549 ms

icons.woff

icons.woff

537 ms

interviewjoy_logo.png

interviewjoy_logo.png

536 ms

interviewjoy_logo-1.png

interviewjoy_logo-1.png

537 ms

interviewjoy_hero_2-1.png

interviewjoy_hero_2-1.png

518 ms

amazon_interview_questions_1.png

amazon_interview_questions_1.png

516 ms

google_1.png

google_1.png

518 ms

meta-fb-1.png

meta-fb-1.png

435 ms

apple_interview_guide.jpg

apple_interview_guide.jpg

393 ms

mslogo.jpg

mslogo.jpg

380 ms

lyft_logo-1.png

lyft_logo-1.png

373 ms

uber_logo-1.png

uber_logo-1.png

375 ms

Amazon-Interview-Process.webp

Amazon-Interview-Process.webp

459 ms

Why-Do-You-Want-to-Work-for-Amazon.webp

Why-Do-You-Want-to-Work-for-Amazon.webp

460 ms

hiring_slowdown.jpg

hiring_slowdown.jpg

460 ms

irs-hiring-1.jpg

irs-hiring-1.jpg

304 ms

resume-writing-tips.jpg

resume-writing-tips.jpg

303 ms

amazon_interview_questions.png

amazon_interview_questions.png

277 ms

Freelancer.png

Freelancer.png

281 ms

interviewjoy_logo_bw.png

interviewjoy_logo_bw.png

262 ms

1px.png

1px.png

255 ms

Accessibility Review

interviewjoy.com accessibility score

62

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

interviewjoy.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

interviewjoy.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interviewjoy.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Interviewjoy.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

interviewjoy.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Interviewjoy. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: