2.3 sec in total
407 ms
1.7 sec
232 ms
Visit intrum.com now to see the best up-to-date Intrum content for Sweden and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about intrum.com
Grow and improve your business by taking advantage of the expertise and experience of Intrum, the undisputed leading Credit Management Services company. We offer both standalone and integrated service...
Visit intrum.comWe analyzed Intrum.com page load time and found that the first response time was 407 ms and then it took 1.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.
intrum.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.8 s
26/100
10%
Value18.2 s
0/100
25%
Value11.5 s
5/100
10%
Value4,240 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.285
42/100
15%
Value18.3 s
3/100
10%
407 ms
277 ms
33 ms
249 ms
200 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Intrum.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (675 ms) belongs to the original domain Intrum.com.
Page size can be reduced by 326.8 kB (57%)
576.2 kB
249.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Intrum.com main page is 576.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 189.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 133.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 133.1 kB or 92% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Intrum images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 98.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 98.8 kB or 52% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 89.8 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Intrum.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 89.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (67%)
55
18
The browser has sent 55 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Intrum. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
intrum.com
407 ms
Master
277 ms
jquery.min.js
33 ms
Master
249 ms
jquery.mousewheel-3.0.6.pack.js
200 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
297 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
195 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.css
200 ms
jquery.fancybox-buttons.js
300 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.css
302 ms
jquery.fancybox-thumbs.js
303 ms
jquery.fancybox-media.js
336 ms
swfobject.js
367 ms
jquery.uploadify.v2.1.4.min.js
375 ms
sIFR.css
388 ms
sifr.js
477 ms
ComposerScript.js
400 ms
WebResource.axd
429 ms
ga.js
32 ms
PageGradient-d3a4ab631843ab59cf6aa006957d8c2e2c2b4e7d.gif
97 ms
logo.gif
127 ms
topmenu_white_start2.gif
110 ms
big_green_arrow.png
122 ms
big_orange_arrow.png
124 ms
cancel.png
127 ms
BoostingYourBusiness.jpg
419 ms
ECPR_291x133.JPG
292 ms
bild_291x133.JPG
296 ms
IJ_291x133_05.JPG
310 ms
Report.JPG
237 ms
PageGradientBorderRight-84e098e866c1e899e0f7648d60a20c5ab4ac4675.gif
201 ms
PageGradientBorderLeft-c92784c1f7abb6811db2475f6a81327163afa30b.gif
293 ms
top_bg-19ab8dcbf3c2cbec7013a7e0fb50a6c666f146e8.gif
314 ms
search_input_background-063c2c6ab0a6dbb4e476cdd52e0aec897a9441c1.gif
369 ms
searchBtn-2c3f50bbbf083917466383f5edea64c80f2616b1.gif
390 ms
top_menu_bg-69063a3be307bd9d7f1fc40be76e702dc3c972ba.gif
407 ms
topmenu_white-53c3886607f0054da416cacefb89cca8f1b44502.gif
394 ms
14_646455_29012016134713.gif
409 ms
topmenu_separator_line-8200d23cc0af34a5e34684c4da1dbd8db0a26f5c.gif
451 ms
1550_646360_28012016081721.gif
479 ms
topmenu_separator_line_sel-099fda62b42b4edb10a3904d485d56b76e4b95eb.gif
485 ms
arrow_green-fda9e26755b3c58f3b29da5b81df1d0ea50c137d.png
485 ms
1156_590569_03102014152206.gif
506 ms
702_638744_27112015155525.gif
504 ms
2041_646361_28012016081759.gif
547 ms
34_646453_29012016134653.gif
595 ms
867_636721_19112015133341.gif
589 ms
399_636259_17112015095828.gif
587 ms
__utm.gif
32 ms
14_646455_29012016134713.gif
574 ms
tiny_green_box_top-fc729a0dbd52a4823b6b7abf75a10f12b522a929.gif
569 ms
tiny_green_box_middle-738cfff1a9af69507483fdd538a4656d37b9eb8a.gif
612 ms
tiny_green_box_bottom-538b58c7fb0dfdf291d6266d50900570ef7cad6a.gif
652 ms
footer_gradient-2feb1687d03af6b27ff6161a4b93e5eeaed75ae8.gif
661 ms
footer_border-1d6a08a55373997c33b036e41df89edb90ff4f5f.gif
675 ms
105 ms
intrum.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
intrum.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
intrum.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intrum.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Intrum.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
intrum.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Intrum. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: