1.4 sec in total
64 ms
968 ms
328 ms
Welcome to ipack.com homepage info - get ready to check Ipack best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about ipack.com
3M Products, Poly Bags, Plastic Sheeting, Honeycomb, Corner Board, Plastic Sheeting, Shrink Wrapping Machines, Stretch Wrapping Machines, Packaging Adhesives, Foam in Place Systems, Void Fill Systems,...
Visit ipack.comWe analyzed Ipack.com page load time and found that the first response time was 64 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
ipack.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.3 s
17/100
10%
Value7.4 s
4/100
25%
Value6.4 s
40/100
10%
Value920 ms
31/100
30%
Value0.093
91/100
15%
Value17.2 s
4/100
10%
64 ms
385 ms
84 ms
29 ms
130 ms
Our browser made a total of 57 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Ipack.com, 4% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 4% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (385 ms) belongs to the original domain Ipack.com.
Page size can be reduced by 436.4 kB (57%)
765.9 kB
329.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Ipack.com main page is 765.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 325.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 53.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 53.3 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 91.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ipack needs image optimization as it can save up to 91.3 kB or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 222.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 222.5 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 69.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ipack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 69.3 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 26 (48%)
54
28
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ipack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ipack.com
64 ms
www.ipack.com
385 ms
salog.js.aspx
84 ms
integration.js
29 ms
base.css
130 ms
nav.css
62 ms
ipacktv.css
62 ms
account.css
61 ms
custom.css
61 ms
ajax-dynamic-list.css
108 ms
skin.css
109 ms
modal_basic.css
109 ms
jquery.hoverIntent.minified.js
109 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
108 ms
core.js
172 ms
custom.js
171 ms
form_check.js.php
226 ms
jquery.simplemodal_mobile.js
194 ms
jwplayer.js
283 ms
tinynav.min.js
170 ms
ajax-dynamic-list-sack.js
214 ms
ajax-dynamic-list.js
237 ms
current.js
191 ms
140368.js
139 ms
ga.js
23 ms
__utm.gif
16 ms
collect
78 ms
jquery.min.js
30 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
47 ms
ab356cd6-c680-4b0d-bc95-e1e72c24e1d4.png
217 ms
equipment.jpg
23 ms
ips_logo_header.png
91 ms
sidebar-insights.png
91 ms
sidebar-service.png
51 ms
sidebar-engineering.png
90 ms
sidebar-ipack-tv.png
51 ms
sidebar-about-us.png
53 ms
sidebar-catalog.png
99 ms
ips-gsa-certified.png
101 ms
iso-web-graphic.png
101 ms
secondary-engineering.png
152 ms
secondary-ipacktv.png
173 ms
secondary-costsavings.png
188 ms
secondary-sustainability.png
185 ms
pdalogo.png
145 ms
header_bg_dkblue.jpg
129 ms
loader.js
66 ms
packaging-insights-banner.png
206 ms
article.png
162 ms
quote_button_red.png
207 ms
line.gif
166 ms
secondary_bg.png
198 ms
fm.js
133 ms
loader0.js
59 ms
pack_supplies.jpg
43 ms
1442-211-10-9316.js
113 ms
fm.js
102 ms
ipack.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[role]s do not have all required [aria-*] attributes
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ipack.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
ipack.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ipack.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ipack.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ipack.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ipack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: