4.6 sec in total
392 ms
3.3 sec
856 ms
Welcome to ipack.llc homepage info - get ready to check Ipack best content right away, or after learning these important things about ipack.llc
Welcome to ipack llc we are manufacturing of plastic film , cling film, stretch film, supply of Core Board Paper Feed , Slatted Reel, Kraft Paper / Linear, Corrugated Gum Powder ,Dextrin Starch, Corru...
Visit ipack.llcWe analyzed Ipack.llc page load time and found that the first response time was 392 ms and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
ipack.llc performance score
392 ms
404 ms
179 ms
332 ms
247 ms
Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 63% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Ipack.llc, 35% (22 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (884 ms) belongs to the original domain Ipack.llc.
Page size can be reduced by 129.9 kB (10%)
1.3 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Ipack.llc main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 911.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 23.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.0 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 241 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ipack images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 72.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 72.0 kB or 28% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 34.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ipack.llc needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 34.6 kB or 33% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (58%)
36
15
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ipack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ipack.llc
392 ms
ipack.llc
404 ms
bootstrap.css
179 ms
style.css
332 ms
slick.css
247 ms
responsive.css
247 ms
jquery.js
425 ms
popper.min.js
268 ms
bootstrap.min.js
298 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.concat.min.js
373 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
475 ms
appear.js
373 ms
owl.js
466 ms
wow.js
404 ms
slick.js
406 ms
jquery-ui.js
761 ms
script.js
475 ms
logo.png
482 ms
logo-small.png
488 ms
video-img.jpg
708 ms
image-1.jpg
793 ms
news-3.jpg
785 ms
news-2.jpg
636 ms
news-4.jpg
884 ms
image-2.jpg
884 ms
author-1.jpg
783 ms
css
98 ms
font-awesome.css
543 ms
flaticon.css
575 ms
animate.css
581 ms
owl.css
579 ms
jquery-ui.css
627 ms
jquery.fancybox.min.css
661 ms
jquery.mCustomScrollbar.min.css
657 ms
preloader.svg
324 ms
image-1.jpg
594 ms
image-2.jpg
622 ms
5aU69_a8oxmIdGl4Ag.woff
65 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfJpbERySiw.woff
142 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfMJaERySiw.woff
142 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfLZcERySiw.woff
146 ms
5aU19_a8oxmIfNJdERySiw.woff
150 ms
fontawesome-webfont914c.woff
434 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLCz7Z1xlEw.woff
146 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDD4Z1xlEw.woff
148 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLBT5Z1xlEw.woff
201 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLEj6Z1xlEw.woff
122 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLGT9Z1xlEw.woff
202 ms
pxiEyp8kv8JHgFVrJJfedA.woff
202 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLDz8Z1xlEw.woff
203 ms
pxiByp8kv8JHgFVrLFj_Z1xlEw.woff
206 ms
pxiGyp8kv8JHgFVrLPTucHtG.woff
204 ms
flaticon.svg
510 ms
flaticon.woff
399 ms
u-4m0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-eRZOf-Q.woff
205 ms
u-4l0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-eR7lXff4jvo.woff
204 ms
u-4l0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-eR71Wvf4jvo.woff
206 ms
u-4l0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-eR7NWPf4jvo.woff
404 ms
u-440qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l5-fCZK.woff
206 ms
u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l521wRZWMf8.woff
209 ms
u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l52xwNZWMf8.woff
208 ms
u-4n0qyriQwlOrhSvowK_l52_wFZWMf8.woff
207 ms
ipack.llc SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ipack.llc can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ipack.llc main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ipack.llc
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ipack. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: