5.3 sec in total
912 ms
4.2 sec
196 ms
Welcome to irm.org homepage info - get ready to check Irm best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about irm.org
IRM is the largest railway museum in the United States. Located northwest of Chicago, we offer rides on steam, diesel, and electric trains.
Visit irm.orgWe analyzed Irm.org page load time and found that the first response time was 912 ms and then it took 4.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
irm.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.4 s
0/100
10%
Value19.7 s
0/100
25%
Value14.4 s
1/100
10%
Value2,940 ms
3/100
30%
Value0.057
98/100
15%
Value24.6 s
0/100
10%
912 ms
1852 ms
5 ms
139 ms
106 ms
Our browser made a total of 39 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (32 requests) were addressed to the original Irm.org, 5% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 5% (2 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Irm.org.
Page size can be reduced by 98.7 kB (17%)
567.1 kB
468.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Irm.org main page is 567.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 458.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 36.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.6 kB, which is 11% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 36.4 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 32.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Irm images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 28.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 28.4 kB or 44% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Irm.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.4 kB or 77% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (11%)
36
32
The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Irm. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
irm.org
912 ms
www.irm.org
1852 ms
ga.js
5 ms
jquery-1.2.6.pack.js
139 ms
simplegallery.js
106 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
collect
60 ms
320
1027 ms
bloglisting.html
55 ms
ady.thumb.jpg
123 ms
aaa.thumb.jpg
153 ms
CBQ504restoration.highlight.jpg
61 ms
adj.highlight.jpg
133 ms
abp.highlight.jpg
193 ms
acv.thumb.jpg
419 ms
aaa.thumb.jpg
244 ms
aav.thumb.jpg
398 ms
aay.thumb.jpg
459 ms
aab.thumb.jpg
430 ms
aab.thumb.jpg
582 ms
ctacharter2016.jpg
449 ms
openingday2016.jpg
538 ms
2016mothersday.jpg
564 ms
2016scoutday.jpg
571 ms
2016steambenefit.jpg
524 ms
barn14.jpg
614 ms
homepagetitlebw.gif
572 ms
alrm-phnum-bw.png
580 ms
cleardot.gif
600 ms
donatenow2.jpg
612 ms
cta-signs.gif
615 ms
left.gif
645 ms
pause.gif
635 ms
right.gif
652 ms
irmblogrss.css
681 ms
feed2js.php
1007 ms
like.php
200 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
1032 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
1032 ms
irm.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
irm.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
irm.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
ISO-8859-1
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Irm.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Irm.org main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
irm.org
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Irm. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: