Tools & Wizards About Us
jamescharlick.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    58% of other websites

  • 75

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

jamescharlick.com

Index of /

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

593 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

207 ms

jamescharlick.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to jamescharlick.com homepage info - get ready to check Jamescharlick best content right away, or after learning these important things about jamescharlick.com

Website Design, Print Design, Illustration and Photography, based in Weston-Super-Mare, Bristol, Somerset

Visit jamescharlick.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jamescharlick.com page load time and found that the first response time was 593 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jamescharlick.com performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

66/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

43/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.0 s

46/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,210 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.1 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jamescharlick.com

593 ms

style.css

93 ms

flexslider.css

121 ms

colorbox.css

141 ms

jquery.min.js

24 ms

Our browser made a total of 50 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Jamescharlick.com, 22% (11 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Syndication.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (593 ms) belongs to the original domain Jamescharlick.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 23.4 kB (3%)

Content Size

897.8 kB

After Optimization

874.4 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Jamescharlick.com main page is 897.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 824.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 14.5 kB

  • Original 18.7 kB
  • After minification 16.4 kB
  • After compression 4.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.3 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 14.5 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.2 kB

  • Original 824.2 kB
  • After minification 823.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jamescharlick images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 5.2 kB

  • Original 47.6 kB
  • After minification 46.7 kB
  • After compression 42.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 5.2 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-34%

Potential reduce by 2.5 kB

  • Original 7.3 kB
  • After minification 7.3 kB
  • After compression 4.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jamescharlick.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.5 kB or 34% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (30%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

32

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jamescharlick. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

jamescharlick.com

jamescharlick.com

593 ms

style.css

style.css

93 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

121 ms

colorbox.css

colorbox.css

141 ms

jquery.min.js

jquery.min.js

24 ms

jquery.easing.1.3.js

jquery.easing.1.3.js

169 ms

jquery.flexslider-min.js

jquery.flexslider-min.js

170 ms

slider_home.js

slider_home.js

170 ms

jquery.colorbox-min.js

jquery.colorbox-min.js

171 ms

ubuntu-r-webfont.woff

ubuntu-r-webfont.woff

151 ms

widgets.js

widgets.js

46 ms

header_mail.png

header_mail.png

82 ms

footer_tel.png

footer_tel.png

81 ms

header_tel.png

header_tel.png

73 ms

header_jc.png

header_jc.png

89 ms

JCfeatbg.jpg

JCfeatbg.jpg

79 ms

pure.jpg

pure.jpg

309 ms

forge.jpg

forge.jpg

365 ms

helenknits.jpg

helenknits.jpg

295 ms

chernobyl.jpg

chernobyl.jpg

355 ms

lindy.jpg

lindy.jpg

484 ms

hairstudio.jpg

hairstudio.jpg

255 ms

tacres.jpg

tacres.jpg

329 ms

gm.jpg

gm.jpg

371 ms

bls.jpg

bls.jpg

378 ms

bsca.jpg

bsca.jpg

400 ms

face.jpg

face.jpg

430 ms

helenknits.jpg

helenknits.jpg

442 ms

footer_mail.png

footer_mail.png

443 ms

footer_twitter.png

footer_twitter.png

441 ms

footer_facebook.png

footer_facebook.png

470 ms

footer_tumblr.png

footer_tumblr.png

500 ms

footer_flickr.png

footer_flickr.png

501 ms

overlay.png

overlay.png

512 ms

ubuntu-li-webfont.woff

ubuntu-li-webfont.woff

527 ms

widget_iframe.7dae38096d06923d683a2a807172322a.html

widget_iframe.7dae38096d06923d683a2a807172322a.html

179 ms

settings

settings

73 ms

horizon_timeline.a7991bb824d62c8d5038ddd875db8389.js

horizon_timeline.a7991bb824d62c8d5038ddd875db8389.js

26 ms

embeds

embeds

26 ms

JCharlickcom

JCharlickcom

36 ms

polyfills-57d3feabe8bfd4ee389c.js

polyfills-57d3feabe8bfd4ee389c.js

25 ms

runtime-eb61dff4a84b8f906e6b.js

runtime-eb61dff4a84b8f906e6b.js

56 ms

modules.c7def0268c66f6a548ed.js

modules.c7def0268c66f6a548ed.js

108 ms

main-e9db78f5e7b3d83edd5e.js

main-e9db78f5e7b3d83edd5e.js

103 ms

_app-446fb4a338b215deec8c.js

_app-446fb4a338b215deec8c.js

102 ms

%5BscreenName%5D-c8b4c96951cf24f547b4.js

%5BscreenName%5D-c8b4c96951cf24f547b4.js

101 ms

_buildManifest.js

_buildManifest.js

111 ms

_ssgManifest.js

_ssgManifest.js

107 ms

icons_category_20px.png

icons_category_20px.png

72 ms

flexslider-icon.woff

flexslider-icon.woff

72 ms

Accessibility Review

jamescharlick.com accessibility score

75

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

jamescharlick.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

jamescharlick.com SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jamescharlick.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jamescharlick.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

jamescharlick.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jamescharlick. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: